Steve Vladeck

Since 2017, the Supreme Court has significantly increased its use of the process by which the justices hear and resolves emergency appeals, sometimes known as the shadow docket. These decisions are made without oral argument and often come in short unsigned orders. Stephen Vladeck, the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas School of Law, has closely tracked that change and its impact on the court as an institution in recent years. Vladeck joins Amy to discuss his new book The Shadow Docket. We are taking a hiatus from our regularly scheduled episodes this spring. We hope to be back soon. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Since 2017, the Supreme Court has significantly increased its use of the process by which the justices hear and resolves emergency appeals, sometimes known as the shadow docket. These decisions are made without oral argument and often come in short unsigned orders. Stephen Vladeck, the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas School of Law, has closely tracked that change and its impact on the court as an institution in recent years. Vladeck joins Amy to discuss his new book The Shadow Docket. We are taking a hiatus from our regularly scheduled episodes this spring. We hope to be back soon. (Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

The shadow docket with Steve Vladeck

In the first week of the February session, the justices heard oral arguments in two cases about the scoop of liability tech companies may face for user content. Amy is joined by Megan Iorio of the Electronic Privacy Information Center to break down those arguments in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh. EPIC filed an amicus brief in Gonzalez in support of neither party. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In the first week of the February session, the justices heard oral arguments in two cases about the scoop of liability tech companies may face for user content. Amy is joined by Megan Iorio of the Electronic Privacy Information Center to break down those arguments in <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/gonzalez-v-google-llc/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Gonzalez v. Google</a> and <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/twitter-inc-v-taamneh/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Twitter v. Taamneh</a>. EPIC filed an <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-1333/249376/20221207151042885_21-1333%20Electronic%20Privacy%20Information%20Center%20Amicus%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Neither%20Party.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">amicus brief</a> in Gonzalez in support of neither party. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Section 230 and the internet 

In another edition of our series of interviews with Supreme Court advocates, Amy sits down with Daniel Geyser, head of the Supreme Court practice at Haynes Boone. Geyser has argued 15 cases before the court, including two this term. He shares his thoughts on how to take advantage of the new argument structure and his advice for first time advocates.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In another edition of our series of interviews with Supreme Court advocates, Amy sits down with Daniel Geyser, head of the Supreme Court practice at Haynes Boone. Geyser has argued 15 cases before the court, including two this term. He shares his thoughts on how to take advantage of the new argument structure and his advice for first time advocates.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUS Spotlight: Daniel Geyser

In an essay published in The New York Times this fall, two law professors, Lisa Tucker and Stefanie Lindquist, argued that the Supreme Court is increasingly setting aside significant decisions from the lower courts as if they never happened. The court is invalidating these decisions in brief procedural orders under what’s known as “Munsingwear vacatur.” Amy sits down with Tucker and Lindquist to hear more about the trend.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In an essay published in The New York Times this fall, two law professors, Lisa Tucker and Stefanie Lindquist, argued that the Supreme Court is increasingly setting aside significant decisions from the lower courts as if they never happened. The court is invalidating these decisions in brief procedural orders under what’s known as “Munsingwear vacatur.” Amy sits down with Tucker and Lindquist to hear more about the trend.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

What’s going on with Munsingwear?

After more than three decades covering the Supreme Court, Marcia Coyle has announced her retirement from the National Law Journal. Amy sits down with Coyle to discuss her career, her book, and how covering the court has changed over the years.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

After more than three decades covering the Supreme Court, Marcia Coyle has announced her retirement from the National Law Journal. Amy sits down with Coyle to discuss her career, her book, and how covering the court has changed over the years.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Three decades covering the Supreme Court

The end of the calendar year means we’re about a third of the way through the SCOTUS year. Amy sits down with SCOTUSblog editor James Romoser to discuss the first three months of the 2022 term.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The end of the calendar year means we’re about a third of the way through the SCOTUS year. Amy sits down with SCOTUSblog editor James Romoser to discuss the first three months of the 2022 term.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Looking back at the term so far

UCLA election law professor Richard Hasen joins Amy to explain Moore v. Harper, the case in which North Carolina legislators ask the justices to consider a theory that would give state legislatures near complete power to regulate federal elections without interference from state courts. Hasen breaks down the theory, known as the independent state legislature theory, and points to important briefs and potential outcomes to keep an eye out for. Moore v. Harper will be argued Wednesday, Dec. 7.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

UCLA election law professor Richard Hasen joins Amy to explain Moore v. Harper, the case in which North Carolina legislators ask the justices to consider a theory that would give state legislatures near complete power to regulate federal elections without interference from state courts. Hasen breaks down the theory, known as the independent state legislature theory, and points to important briefs and potential outcomes to keep an eye out for. Moore v. Harper will be argued Wednesday, Dec. 7.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

The 800-pound gorilla

On Dec. 5 the justices will hear oral argument in 303 Creative v. Elenis, a clash between free speech rights and LGBTQ rights. Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr joins Amy to explain the case and what to expect at oral argument. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On Dec. 5 the justices will hear oral argument in 303 Creative v. Elenis, a clash between free speech rights and LGBTQ rights. Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr joins Amy to explain the case and what to expect at oral argument. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Can a web designer refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings?

On Friday, June 24, the court ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Amy talks with abortion law scholar Mary Ziegler, professor of law at University of California, Davis, about the decision and what it means for those seeking abortion care across the country. Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On Friday, June 24, the court ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Amy talks with abortion law scholar Mary Ziegler, professor of law at University of California, Davis, about the decision and what it means for those seeking abortion care across the country. Send us a question about the court at <a href="mailto:scotustalk@scotusblog.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">scotustalk@scotusblog.com</a> or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

The Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade

Michael Dreeben

Michael Dreeben, who has argued 107 cases at the Supreme Court, joins us for another episode in our SCOTUS Spotlight series. Dreeben looks back on notable moments from his career as an advocate, including his very first argument -- in which he faced off against another first-timer by the name of John Roberts.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Michael Dreeben, who has argued 107 cases at the Supreme Court, joins us for another episode in our SCOTUS Spotlight series. Dreeben looks back on notable moments from his career as an advocate, including his very first argument -- in which he faced off against another first-timer by the name of John Roberts.Send us a question about the court at scotustalk@scotusblog.com or leave us a voicemail at (202) 596-2906. Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from.(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUS Spotlight: Michael Dreeben on helping the justices have a conversation

SCOTUStalk is a nonpartisan podcast about the Supreme Court for lawyers and non-lawyers alike, brought to you by SCOTUSblog. SCOTUStalk is hosted by Amy Howe and produced and edited by Ellena Erskine. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This is, in my humble opinion, needed to be observed with a closer eye by every American...heck!, even those who need an education from any other country. Explanations and descriptions of the cases, standing ,amicus briefs, etc. thourough and understandable.

Public Education

This is a good podcast for someone looking for a brief roundup of Supreme Court cases from a nonpartisan perspective. The analysis is relatively brief, though, and other Supreme Court podcasts provide more depth.

Incredible website, not an incredible podcast

SCOTUStalk is a nonpartisan podcast about the Supreme Court for lawyers and non-lawyers alike, brought to you by SCOTUSblog. SCOTUStalk is hosted by Amy Howe and produced and edited by Ellena Erskine. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUStalk

Tom Goldstein

Kevin Russell

Amy Howe

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Tom Goldstein and Kevin Russell join Amy Howe of Howe on the Court to discuss the Supreme Court's announcement that it will weigh in next term on whether federal employment discrimination laws protect LGBT employees in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda and R.G. &amp; G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Tom Goldstein and Kevin Russell join Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> to discuss the Supreme Court's announcement that it will weigh in next term on whether federal employment discrimination laws protect LGBT employees in <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia</a>, <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/altitude-express-inc-v-zarda/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda</a> and <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/r-g-g-r-harris-funeral-homes-inc-v-equal-opportunity-employment-commission/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">R.G. &amp; G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

“Because of sex”: Tom Goldstein and Kevin Russell join Amy Howe to discuss new cases involving whether federal employment discrimination laws protect LGBT employees

David Savage

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court briefly covers the latest Supreme Court news before speaking with Tom Goldstein of SCOTUSblog and David Savage of the Los Angeles Times about abortion and recent legislation aimed at overturning Roe v. Wade. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of <a href="https://shows.pippa.io/5c7d6c6a80f32c6a7cdeca24" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> briefly covers the latest Supreme Court news before speaking with Tom Goldstein of <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/author/tom-goldstein/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUSblog</a> and David Savage of the <a href="https://www.latimes.com/la-bio-david-savage-staff.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Los Angeles Times</a> about abortion and recent legislation aimed at overturning Roe v. Wade. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Tom Goldstein and David Savage talk through abortion, precedent and the Supreme Court

John Elwood

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court briefly covers the latest Supreme Court news before speaking with John Elwood about the essentials concerning petitions for certiorari. Elwood is a partner at Vinson &amp; Elkins and the author of “Relist Watch.”(In the episode, Elwood suggested there were eight previously rescheduled cases. He later clarified with us that there were five: Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue, Hunter v. United States, JTEKT Corp. v. GKN Automotive, Williams v. United States and Shular v. United States.) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> briefly covers the latest Supreme Court news before speaking with <a href="https://www.velaw.com/Who-We-Are/Find-a-Lawyer/Elwood--John/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">John Elwood</a> about the essentials concerning petitions for certiorari. Elwood is a partner at Vinson &amp; Elkins and the author of “<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/author/john-elwood/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Relist Watch</a>.”(In the episode, Elwood suggested there were eight previously rescheduled cases. He later clarified with us that there were five: Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue, Hunter v. United States, JTEKT Corp. v. GKN Automotive, Williams v. United States and Shular v. United States.) Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUS spotlight: John Elwood on petitions for certiorari

Kimberly Robinson

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court briefly reviews the latest SCOTUS news before providing deeper coverage with Kimberly Robinson of last week’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. New York, a high-profile challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> briefly reviews the latest SCOTUS news before providing deeper coverage with Kimberly Robinson of last week’s oral argument in <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/department-of-commerce-v-new-york/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Department of Commerce v. New York</a>, a high-profile challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Judicial enumeration: Amy Howe and Kimberly Robinson count five justices for the citizenship question in Department of Commerce v. New York

Sarah Harrington

Laura Safdie

On June 28, SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein and Sarah Harrington participated in a webinar discussing the major cases at the Supreme Court this term. The discussion, moderated by Laura Safdie from Casetext, covered Department of Commerce v. New York, holding that a question about citizenship cannot be added to 2020 census until the Commerce Department provides an adequate explanation for doing so,  Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek, holding that partisan-gerrymandering claims present political questions that cannot be reviewed by federal courts, and other cases. Video of the webinar is available at this link. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On June 28, SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein and Sarah Harrington participated in a webinar discussing the major cases at the Supreme Court this term. The discussion, moderated by Laura Safdie from Casetext, covered <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/department-of-commerce-v-new-york/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Department of Commerce v. New York</a>, holding that a question about citizenship cannot be added to 2020 census until the Commerce Department provides an adequate explanation for doing so,  <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/rucho-v-common-cause-2/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Rucho v. Common Cause</a> and <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lamone-v-benisek/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Lamone v. Benisek</a>, holding that partisan-gerrymandering claims present political questions that cannot be reviewed by federal courts, and other cases. Video of the webinar is available at <a href="https://register.gotowebinar.com/recording/1408196618545457163" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">this link</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Tom Goldstein and Sarah Harrington review past Supreme Court term with Casetext’s Laura Safdie

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Sarah Harrington, a partner at Goldstein &amp; Russell who formerly served as an assistant to the solicitor general, joins Amy Howe of Howe on the Court to talk about life in the Office of the Solicitor General. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Sarah Harrington, a partner at Goldstein &amp; Russell who formerly served as an assistant to the solicitor general, joins Amy Howe of Howe on the Court to talk about life in the Office of the Solicitor General. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUS spotlight: Life at OSG

Mark Walsh

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court briefly reviews the latest SCOTUS news before providing deeper coverage with Mark Walsh of last week’s oral argument in Iancu v. Brunetti, a First Amendment challenge to the ban on registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court briefly reviews the latest SCOTUS news before providing deeper coverage with Mark Walsh of last week’s oral argument in Iancu v. Brunetti, a First Amendment challenge to the ban on registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

A trademark case with colorful language: Amy Howe and Mark Walsh talk through Iancu v. Brunetti

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court and Tom Goldstein take a look at what’s ahead at the Supreme Court for the final weeks of June. The justices have 24 argued cases still to decide, including a number of the more high-profile cases from this year’s docket: Gundy v. United States, The American Legion v. American Humanist Association, Department of Commerce v. New York, and partisan-gerrymandering cases Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek.  Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/author/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> and Tom Goldstein take a look at what’s ahead at the Supreme Court for the final weeks of June. The justices have 24 argued cases still to decide, including a number of the more high-profile cases from this year’s docket: Gundy v. United States, The American Legion v. American Humanist Association, Department of Commerce v. New York, and partisan-gerrymandering cases Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek.  Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

The final three weeks of October term 2018

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court reviews Monday’s Supreme Court orders and opinions. The justices released their decisions in four argued cases: Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, Virginia Uranium Inc. v. Warren, Gamble v. United States and Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill. The justices also granted, vacated and remanded Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. The Supreme Court will release decisions in more of its 20 remaining cases on Thursday, June 20. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> reviews Monday’s Supreme Court orders and opinions. The justices released their decisions in four argued cases: <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/manhattan-community-access-corp-v-halleck/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck</a>, <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/virginia-uranium-inc-v-warren/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Virginia Uranium Inc. v. Warren</a>, <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/gamble-v-united-states/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gamble v. United States</a> and <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/virginia-house-of-delegates-v-bethune-hill/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill</a>. The justices also granted, vacated and remanded <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/klein-v-oregon-bureau-of-labor-and-industries/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries</a>. The Supreme Court will release decisions in more of its 20 remaining cases on Thursday, June 20. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Monday at the Supreme Court: Four opinions and a GVR

Paul Smith

This week at SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court begins a four-part series interviewing Supreme Court advocates. In this episode, Paul Smith discusses his notable career arguing 21 cases before the court. Smith is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and Vice President of the Campaign Legal Center. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week at <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> begins a four-part series interviewing Supreme Court advocates. In this episode, Paul Smith discusses his notable career arguing 21 cases before the court. Smith is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and Vice President of the Campaign Legal Center. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUS spotlight: Paul Smith on oral advocacy

William Jay

This week on SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court continues her series interviewing Supreme Court advocates. In this episode, William M. Jay discusses his career arguing 17 cases before the court. Jay is a partner at Goodwin and previously served for five years as an Assistant to the Solicitor General. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> continues her series interviewing Supreme Court advocates. In this episode, William M. Jay discusses his career arguing 17 cases before the court. Jay is a partner at Goodwin and previously served for five years as an Assistant to the Solicitor General. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUS spotlight: William Jay on oral advocacy

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court talks with Evan and Oscie Thomas about Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court. Evan is the author of “First: Sandra Day O’Connor,” a biography released last week. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court talks with Evan and Oscie Thomas about Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court. Evan is the author of “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/First-Sandra-OConnor-Evan-Thomas/dp/0399589287" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">First: Sandra Day O’Connor</a>,” a biography released last week. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

FWOTSC: Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, first woman on the Supreme Court

Tony Mauro

This week on SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court joins Tony Mauro, who recently retired after nearly four decades covering the Supreme Court. Howe asks Mauro about what he saw on the Supreme Court beat – from the justices deciding an election to contentious confirmation hearings – and what he was hoping to see – from better recruitment of minority law clerks to cameras in the court. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> joins Tony Mauro, who recently retired after nearly four decades covering the Supreme Court. Howe asks Mauro about what he saw on the Supreme Court beat – from the justices deciding an election to contentious confirmation hearings – and what he was hoping to see – from better recruitment of minority law clerks to cameras in the court. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

SCOTUS Spotlight: Tony Mauro on the Supreme Court beat

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court talks with Professor Stephen Wermiel of American University Washington College of Law about Supreme Court retirements, both in the possible future and from the recent past. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court talks with Professor Stephen Wermiel of American University Washington College of Law about Supreme Court retirements, both in the possible future and from the recent past. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Spring in Washington: Retirement talk

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court reviews Monday’s Supreme Court orders and opinions. The justices released their decisions in four argued cases: Iancu v. Brunetti, United States v. Davis, Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media and The Dutra Group v. Batterton. The justices also granted review in eight cases, for a total of five hours of oral argument. The Supreme Court will release decisions in more of its eight remaining cases on Wednesday, June 26. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of <a href="http://amylhowe.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Howe on the Court</a> reviews Monday’s Supreme Court orders and opinions. The justices released their decisions in four argued cases: Iancu v. Brunetti, United States v. Davis, Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media and The Dutra Group v. Batterton. The justices also granted review in eight cases, for a total of five hours of oral argument. The Supreme Court will release decisions in more of its eight remaining cases on Wednesday, June 26. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

From 12 to 8: Final countdown at the Supreme Court

Since October, SCOTUSblog has been outside the Supreme Court collecting data and stories from people who traveled to see oral arguments in person during the 2019-2020 term. On December 11, 2019, two of our staff attempted to obtain seats via the public line to watch an argument. They recorded their experience in hopes that it would aid others who want to be part of the audience in the courtroom. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Since October, SCOTUSblog has been outside the Supreme Court collecting data and stories from people who traveled to see oral arguments in person during the 2019-2020 term. On December 11, 2019, two of our staff attempted to obtain seats via the public line to watch an argument. They recorded their experience in hopes that it would aid others who want to be part of the audience in the courtroom. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Courtroom access: SCOTUStalk stands in line for Supreme Court seats

MARCIA COYLE

This week on SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe sits down with Marcia Coyle, who covers the Supreme Court for the National Law Journal, to discuss the oral arguments in two cases heard by the court last week -- the first about a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals and the second involving the leadership structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe sits down with Marcia Coyle, who covers the Supreme Court for the National Law Journal, to discuss the oral arguments in two cases heard by the court last week -- the first about a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals and the second involving the leadership structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Abortion and the structure of the CFPB: Marcia Coyle joins Amy Howe to discuss last week's oral arguments

On Thursday, February 20, Casetext and SCOTUSblog hosted the second webinar in a two-part series previewing the biggest decisions expected this term at the Supreme Court. Tom Goldstein and Kevin Russell covered President Donald Trump’s tax returns, religious school funding, the future of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and faithless electors in the 2020 presidential race. The webinar was co-sponsored by the American Constitution Society and the Federalist Society. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On Thursday, February 20, <a href="https://casetext.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Casetext</a> and SCOTUSblog hosted the second webinar in a two-part series previewing the biggest decisions expected this term at the Supreme Court. Tom Goldstein and Kevin Russell covered President Donald Trump’s tax returns, religious school funding, the future of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and faithless electors in the 2020 presidential race. The webinar was co-sponsored by the <a href="https://www.acslaw.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">American Constitution Society</a> and the <a href="https://fedsoc.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Federalist Society</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

2020 Supreme Court Preview (pt 2)

On January 28, Casetext and SCOTUSblog conducted the first webinar in a two-part series previewing the biggest decisions expected this term at the Supreme Court. Casetext chief operating officer and general counsel Laura Safdie moderated the panel, featuring SCOTUSblog founder and Goldstein &amp; Russell partner Tom Goldstein and Goldstein &amp; Russell partner Sarah Harrington. The webinar covered high-profile cases involving Title VII and LGBT discrimination, the DACA program, the Second Amendment and the future of an abortion law in Louisiana.The second part of this series will be live on Thursday, February 20, at 12 noon EST. Register now. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

On January 28, Casetext and SCOTUSblog conducted the first webinar in a two-part series previewing the biggest decisions expected this term at the Supreme Court. Casetext chief operating officer and general counsel Laura Safdie moderated the panel, featuring SCOTUSblog founder and Goldstein &amp; Russell partner Tom Goldstein and Goldstein &amp; Russell partner Sarah Harrington. The webinar covered high-profile cases involving Title VII and LGBT discrimination, the DACA program, the Second Amendment and the future of an abortion law in Louisiana.The second part of this series will be live on Thursday, February 20, at 12 noon EST. <a href="https://casetext.com/webinar-2020-supreme-court-preview-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Register now</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

2020 Supreme Court Preview presented by Casetext and SCOTUSblog

This week on SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe sits down with Kevin Russell to discuss the oral arguments in the LGBT employment discrimination cases heard by the court last week. The pair talk about Pam Karlan's opening argument in Bostock v. Clayton County, the two-minute rule, Justice Kagan's interpretation of "because of sex" and Justice Gorsuch's concern about the "massive social upheaval that would be entailed" by deciding that sex discrimination under Title VII covers transgender people. Kevin Russell is a partner at Goldstein &amp; Russell and has argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court. Disclosure: Goldstein &amp; Russell, P.C., is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/category/scotustalk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SCOTUStalk</a>, Amy Howe sits down with Kevin Russell to discuss the oral arguments in the LGBT employment discrimination cases heard by the court last week. The pair talk about Pam Karlan's opening argument in <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/bostock-v-clayton-county-georgia/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bostock v. Clayton County</a>, the two-minute rule, Justice Kagan's interpretation of "because of sex" and Justice Gorsuch's concern about the "massive social upheaval that would be entailed" by deciding that sex discrimination under Title VII covers transgender people. Kevin Russell is a partner at Goldstein &amp; Russell and has argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court. Disclosure: Goldstein &amp; Russell, P.C., is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/r-g-g-r-harris-funeral-homes-inc-v-equal-opportunity-employment-commission/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Are we all textualists now?: Amy Howe and Kevin Russell discuss oral arguments in LGBT employment discrimination cases

The best episodes for anyone looking to learn more about topics such as happiness, fulfillment, depression and psychology/mental health in general. With interviews with industry experts, personal stories of individuals, this topic has lessons applicable to everyone. Add episodes you're interested into your queue below!

Best Episodes on Mental Health, Emotions & Thoughts

The best philosophy podcast episodes. Asking questions about how to live a better life, what it means to be and do good, to the idea of God. This topic includes episodes that bring about important questions that everyone should be asking themselves. Add episodes you're interested into your queue below!