Myanna Dellinger interviews Guðný Nielsen who explains how her organization, SoGreen, uses carbon offsets for the education of girls in Africa and how that, in turn, helps reduce climate change. SoGreen is an Icelandic Climate Tech startup based out of her hometown Reykjavik, Iceland. SoGreen focuses on scaling up climate solutions that are founded in social impact and community development in low-income countries.

Myanna Dellinger interviews <a href="https://sogreen.is/about.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Guðný Nielsen</a> who explains how her organization, SoGreen, uses carbon offsets for the education of girls in Africa and how that, in turn, helps reduce climate change. <a href="https://sogreen.is" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SoGreen</a> is an Icelandic Climate Tech startup based out of her hometown Reykjavik, Iceland. SoGreen focuses on scaling up climate solutions that are founded in social impact and community development in low-income countries.

Educating girls in Africa using carbon offsets

While the U.S. and other national governance systems are arguably not taking sufficient and certainly not sufficiently urgent action against climate change, other inroads may work better.  Further, new behavioral science shows new ways of persuading both corporations and individuals to think and act in better ways in relation to climate change.  In this episode, EinStrong law and policy director Myanna Dellinger, Esq., will talk with Dr. Kristian S Nielsen of Cambridge University about private and public climate governance for climate change mitigation in the U.S. and beyond. Dr. Kristian S Nielsen is a postdoctoral research associate at the Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge. Kristian received a PhD from Copenhagen Business School in 2019 with a dissertation examining the role of self-regulation in environmental behavior change. Kristian's current research focuses on behavior change in the context of climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable clothing consumption. Special thanks to David Dellinger for recording and editing this podcast.

While the U.S. and other national governance systems are arguably not taking sufficient and certainly not sufficiently urgent action against climate change, other inroads may work better.  Further, new behavioral science shows new ways of persuading both corporations and individuals to think and act in better ways in relation to climate change.  In this episode, <a href="https://EinStrong.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">EinStrong</a> law and policy director Myanna Dellinger, Esq., will talk with <a href="https://www.sdmlab.psychol.cam.ac.uk/staff/dr-kristian-s-nielsen" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dr. Kristian S Nielsen</a> of Cambridge University about private and public climate governance for climate change mitigation in the U.S. and beyond. Dr. Kristian S Nielsen is a postdoctoral research associate at the Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge. Kristian received a PhD from Copenhagen Business School in 2019 with a dissertation examining the role of self-regulation in environmental behavior change. Kristian's current research focuses on behavior change in the context of climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable clothing consumption. Special thanks to David Dellinger for recording and editing this podcast.

Climate Change Governance

Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews law professor and Brazilian attorney Dr. Carolina Arlota of the University of Oklahoma College of Law, who compares climate change action in Brazil to that in the United States.  Among other things, she promotes the view that litigation may help advance the agenda even if positive outcomes are not achieved at the judicial scale because of, among other things, the “poltical question doctrine.”  Professor Arlota also discusses the Brazilian Constitution, which promotes environmental protection. This interview is based on Dr. Arlota’s article "The Amazon Is Burning—Is Paris, Too? A Comparative Analysis Between The United States And Brazil Based On The Paris Agreement On Climate Change" published in the Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 52, 2020. The findings demonstrate that, given the silence of the U.S. Constitution on environmental matters and the decades-long congressional inertia on climate issues, an effective way to update the U.S. constitutional text will be through judicial review. As the comparative analysis unveiled in this article shows, standing is a major barrier to judicial review on climate change claims. Accordingly, this article includes a recommendation for the flexibilization of the traditional standing requirements for the United States to achieve effective environmental protection and related mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

<a href="https://professordellinger.com." rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews law professor and Brazilian attorney <a href="https://works.bepress.com/carolina-arlota/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dr. Carolina Arlota</a> of the University of Oklahoma College of Law, who compares climate change action in Brazil to that in the United States.  Among other things, she promotes the view that litigation may help advance the agenda even if positive outcomes are not achieved at the judicial scale because of, among other things, the “poltical question doctrine.”  Professor Arlota also discusses the Brazilian Constitution, which promotes environmental protection. This interview is based on Dr. Arlota’s article "<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3840547" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Amazon Is Burning—Is Paris, Too? A Comparative Analysis Between The United States And Brazil Based On The Paris Agreement On Climate Change</a>" published in the Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 52, 2020. The findings demonstrate that, given the silence of the U.S. Constitution on environmental matters and the decades-long congressional inertia on climate issues, an effective way to update the U.S. constitutional text will be through judicial review. As the comparative analysis unveiled in this article shows, standing is a major barrier to judicial review on climate change claims. Accordingly, this article includes a recommendation for the flexibilization of the traditional standing requirements for the United States to achieve effective environmental protection and related mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

The Amazon is burning – is Paris too?

Lisa Bloom

Lisa Bloom, Esq. is widely known for her tireless work for ordinary people seeking justice, especially victims of sexual harassment, domestic violence, LGBTQ discrimination, racial bias, sexual assault, and excessive police force.  She and her team have won many verdicts and settlements against high profile people accused of misconduct, including sex offender Bill Cosby, serial sexual harasser Bill O’Reilly, Guess CEO Paul Marciano and billionaire Alki David.  In this episode, she is talking about another passion of hers: veganism.  Hear her passion shine through for animals, the health and wellbeing of people around the world, and recommendations for how you too can relatively effortlessly become a vegan or at least start your route towards this goal.

<a href="https://thebloomfirm.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Lisa Bloom</a>, Esq. is widely known for her tireless work for ordinary people seeking justice, especially victims of sexual harassment, domestic violence, LGBTQ discrimination, racial bias, sexual assault, and excessive police force.  She and her team have won many verdicts and settlements against high profile people accused of misconduct, including sex offender Bill Cosby, serial sexual harasser Bill O’Reilly, Guess CEO Paul Marciano and billionaire Alki David.  In this episode, she is talking about another passion of hers: veganism.  Hear her passion shine through for animals, the health and wellbeing of people around the world, and recommendations for how you too can relatively effortlessly become a vegan or at least start your route towards this goal.

Lisa Bloom on Veganism

Hear law professors Sean Kammer (PhD) and Myanna Dellinger (PhD candidate) discuss why the corporate and conservative attempts at keeping the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Dakota Access Pipeline will inevitably fail and why, then, it would be more expedient from an environmental and business point of view to face reality sooner rather than later. This holds true despite the fact that any president does have the power to issue an Executive Order regarding the project. Under the Paris Agreement, we must, among other things, reach net zero emissions by 2050 to help the world – and ourselves – limit catastrophic climate change. UN and other experts have made it clear that we must take sufficient action within the next decade.  For that reason, it also makes not sense to create and continue vast oil distribution networks.

Hear law professors <a href="https://www.usd.edu/faculty-and-staff/Sean-Kammer" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Sean Kammer</a> (PhD) and <a href="https://professordellinger.com." rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Myanna Dellinger</a> (PhD candidate) discuss why the corporate and conservative attempts at keeping the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Dakota Access Pipeline will inevitably fail and why, then, it would be more expedient from an environmental and business point of view to face reality sooner rather than later. This holds true despite the fact that any president does have the power to issue an Executive Order regarding the project. Under the Paris Agreement, we must, among other things, reach net zero emissions by 2050 to help the world – and ourselves – limit catastrophic climate change. UN and other experts have made it clear that we must take sufficient action within the next decade.  For that reason, it also makes not sense to create and continue vast oil distribution networks.

The Keystone Pipeline System: An Exercise in Futility

Color

The fossil fuel industry is not accepting its inevitable fate: that it has to go.  While that is understandable from a purely capitalist business perspective, industry attempts to hang on for dear life by, for example, trying to persuade people of color and low-income people that natural gas is beneficial and “clean” would be laughable if they weren’t as scheming and focused on profits over the health of the planet as they are.  Beware of industry tactics!  Learn more here.

The fossil fuel industry is not accepting its inevitable fate: that it has to go.  While that is understandable from a purely capitalist business perspective, industry attempts to hang on for dear life by, for example, trying to persuade people of color and low-income people that natural gas is beneficial and “clean” would be laughable if they weren’t as scheming and focused on profits over the health of the planet as they are.  Beware of industry tactics!  Learn more here.

Fossil Fuel Industry Gaslighting People of Color

Attorney and activist Maya van Rossum, author of The Green Amendment: Securing Our Right to a Healthy Environment discusses a pioneering new legal strategy to fight growing pollution problems, including drinking water contamination, air pollution, deforestation and climate change, by adopting constitutional green amendments that guarantee a safe and healthy environment.  Van Rossum is also the leader of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, an organization that has successfully stalled fracking and pipeline development in the Northeast. The DRN initiated For the Generations, a project that provides a guide to creating an environmental rights amendment in every US state.    This veteran environmentalist used the constitution in Pennsylvania to take on and beat big fossil fuel industries, and how these amendments could change the legal landscape to crises such as Flint, Keystone, ad beyond. Van Rossum believes that environmental rights are a fundamental human right, just like free speech and the right to private property.

Attorney and activist Maya van Rossum, author of <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Green-Amendment-Securing-Healthy-Environment/dp/1633310213/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1515422862&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=the+green+amendment" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Green Amendment: Securing Our Right to a Healthy Environment</a> discusses a pioneering new legal strategy to fight growing pollution problems, including drinking water contamination, air pollution, deforestation and climate change, by adopting constitutional green amendments that guarantee a safe and healthy environment.  Van Rossum is also the leader of the <a href="http://www.delawareriverkeeper.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Delaware Riverkeeper Network</a>, an organization that has successfully stalled fracking and pipeline development in the Northeast. The DRN initiated <a href="http://forthegenerations.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">For the Generations</a>, a project that provides a guide to creating an environmental rights amendment in every US state.    <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Green-Amendment-Securing-Healthy-Environment/dp/1633310213/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1515422862&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=the+green+amendment" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a> This veteran environmentalist used the constitution in Pennsylvania to take on and beat big fossil fuel industries, and how these amendments could change the legal landscape to crises such as Flint, Keystone, ad beyond. Van Rossum believes that environmental rights are a fundamental human right, just like free speech and the right to private property.

The Green Amendment - Securing our right to a healthy environment

Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Christine Harada, the former Federal Chief Sustainability Officer under the Obama Administration.  Ms. Harada is currently working with the XPRIZE Foundation as a Bold Innovator, developing the next XPRIZE for Clean Air.  Christine is also a Senior Fellow with the Los Angeles CleanTech Incubator, where she helps build out the cleantech economy in Los Angeles, CA. Christine explains what her duties were under the Obama Administration, and how those duties are (hopefully) being carried out under the Trump Administration. This episode was recorded at Occidental College in Los Angeles.

<a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews Christine Harada, the former Federal Chief Sustainability Officer under the Obama Administration.  Ms. Harada is currently working with the <a href="http://www.xprize.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">XPRIZE Foundation</a> as a <a href="http://www.xprize.org/visioneers" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bold Innovator</a>, developing the next XPRIZE for Clean Air.  Christine is also a Senior Fellow with the <a href="http://www.laci.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Los Angeles CleanTech Incubator</a>, where she helps build out the cleantech economy in Los Angeles, CA. Christine explains what her duties were under the Obama Administration, and how those duties are (hopefully) being carried out under the Trump Administration. This episode was recorded at <a href="http://www.oxy.edu/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Occidental College</a> in Los Angeles.

Sustainability and Governance - Taking Steps for the Future

In this epispode, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews David R. Montgomery, a MacArthur Fellow and professor of geomorphology at the University of Washington. He is author of The Hidden Half of Nature and Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations, as well as other award-winning popular science books. He lives in Seattle with his wife, author and biologist Anne Biklé, and Loki, their guide-dog dropout. What if there was a relatively simple, cost-effective way to help feed the world, reduce pollution, pull carbon from the atmosphere, protect biodiversity, and make farmers money to boot?  Through fieldwork spanning three decades and six continents, renowned geologist David R. Montgomery discovers that the answer is right beneath our feet. GROWING A REVOLUTION: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life [W. W. Norton &amp; Company; May 9, 2017] is a spellbinding journey to uncover the blueprint for a regenerative agriculture that builds soil health and leaves both farmers and the environment better off. It is a book that Kirkus Reviews states is, “An optimistic look at how regenerate farming can revive the world’s soil, increasing food production, boosting cost effectiveness, and slowing climate change.” In his quest to reveal the solutions beneath our feet, Montgomery introduces us to innovative farmers who practice regenerative agriculture. Montgomery shows that restoring fertility to the land is not an either-or choice between modern technology and time-tested traditions. Ending with a call for action beyond the fields, Growing a Revolution is an inspiring addition to the bookshelf of anyone seriously concerned with the future of food and farming, our relationship with nature, and the fate of civilization and the planet.

In this epispode, <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="https://www.ess.washington.edu/people/profile.php?pid=montgomery--david" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">David R. Montgomery</a>, a MacArthur Fellow and professor of geomorphology at the <a href="https://www.washington.edu/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">University of Washington</a>. He is author of The Hidden Half of Nature and Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations, as well as other award-winning popular science books. He lives in Seattle with his wife, author and biologist Anne Biklé, and Loki, their guide-dog dropout. What if there was a relatively simple, cost-effective way to help feed the world, reduce pollution, pull carbon from the atmosphere, protect biodiversity, and make farmers money to boot?  Through fieldwork spanning three decades and six continents, renowned geologist David R. Montgomery discovers that the answer is right beneath our feet. GROWING A REVOLUTION: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life [W. W. Norton &amp; Company; May 9, 2017] is a spellbinding journey to uncover the blueprint for a regenerative agriculture that builds soil health and leaves both farmers and the environment better off. It is a book that Kirkus Reviews states is, “An optimistic look at how regenerate farming can revive the world’s soil, increasing food production, boosting cost effectiveness, and slowing climate change.” In his quest to reveal the solutions beneath our feet, Montgomery introduces us to innovative farmers who practice regenerative agriculture. Montgomery shows that restoring fertility to the land is not an either-or choice between modern technology and time-tested traditions. Ending with a call for action beyond the fields, Growing a Revolution is an inspiring addition to the bookshelf of anyone seriously concerned with the future of food and farming, our relationship with nature, and the fate of civilization and the planet.

Regenerative Agriculture

In this podcast hosted by Professor Myanna Dellinger, Dr. Stefan Schäfer presents his view on the pros and cons of the ever-controversial, but, in his view, also promising aspects of climate geoengineering.  Dr. Stefan Schäfer is a political scientist interested in the history, philosophy and politics of science and technology. He leads a research group on climate engineering at the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS) in Potsdam and is Oxford Martin Visiting Fellow at the Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford. He was a guest researcher at the Berlin Social Science Center (WZB) from 2009-2012 and a fellow of the Robert Bosch Foundation’s Global Governance Futures program in 2014-2015. He is a contributing author to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, lead author of the European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering (EuTRACE) report, and chair of the Steering Committee of the Climate Engineering Conference (CEC) series.  He holds a doctorate in political science from Freie Universität Berlin. See his profile at http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/people/stefan-schaefer.

In this podcast hosted by <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a>, <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/people/stefan-schaefer" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dr. Stefan Schäfer</a> presents his view on the pros and cons of the ever-controversial, but, in his view, also promising aspects of climate geoengineering.  Dr. Stefan Schäfer is a political scientist interested in the history, philosophy and politics of science and technology. He leads a research group on climate engineering at the Institute for <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Advanced Sustainability Studies</a> (IASS) in Potsdam and is Oxford Martin Visiting Fellow at the <a href="https://www.insis.ox.ac.uk/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Institute for Science, Innovation and Society</a>, University of Oxford. He was a guest researcher at the <a href="https://www.wzb.eu/en" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Berlin Social Science Center</a> (WZB) from 2009-2012 and a fellow of the Robert Bosch Foundation’s Global Governance Futures program in 2014-2015. He is a contributing author to the Fifth Assessment Report of the <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</a>, lead author of the <a href="http://www.eutrace.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering</a> (EuTRACE) report, and chair of the Steering Committee of the <a href="http://www.ce-conference.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Climate Engineering Conference</a> (CEC) series.  He holds a doctorate in political science from <a href="http://www.fu-berlin.de/en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Freie Universität Berlin</a>. See his profile at <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/people/stefan-schaefer" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/people/stefan-schaefer</a>.

The Logic and Controversies of Geoengineering

A discussion of global and local environmental law issues.  Produced by the EinStrong Foundation and the International Environmental Law Committee of the American Branch of the International Law Association.  Hosted by Myanna Dellinger.

In this podcast, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Dr. Armin Haas on how smart energy grids could solve some of the issues surrounding sustainable energy. Armin Haas is a senior researcher in the Systemic Risk project of the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam (IASS), and leads the IASS activities within the EU Horizon 2020 projects Dolfins and Green-Win. Moreover, he leads the research line Integrated Risk Governance of the Global Climate Forum (GCF). At IASS his main research foci concern the economic, ecological and social sustainability of the financial system, and innovative contributions to the management and governance of systemic risks. At GCF, his research focuses on innovative approaches for the management of large-scale complex uncertainties. He holds a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Karlsruhe, Germany. Before joining IASS, he worked as senior scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and headed the research group Bayesian Risk Management. Together with colleagues from PIK and IIASA, he conceived the SuperSmart Grid.

In this podcast, <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/people/dr-armin-haas" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dr. Armin Haas</a> on how smart energy grids could solve some of the issues surrounding sustainable energy. Armin Haas is a senior researcher in the Systemic Risk project of the Institute for <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam</a> (IASS), and leads the IASS activities within the EU Horizon 2020 projects Dolfins and Green-Win. Moreover, he leads the research line Integrated Risk Governance of the <a href="http://www.globalclimateforum.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Global Climate Forum</a> (GCF). At IASS his main research foci concern the economic, ecological and social sustainability of the financial system, and innovative contributions to the management and governance of systemic risks. At GCF, his research focuses on innovative approaches for the management of large-scale complex uncertainties. He holds a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Karlsruhe, Germany. Before joining IASS, he worked as senior scientist at the <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0ahUKEwiGh7jix_7SAhXlx1QKHcV9DhEQFggdMAA&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pik-potsdam.de%2Fpik-frontpage&amp;usg=AFQjCNHG8Za3sFFK1rj7CkiIQ_zVDt-5rA&amp;sig2=VJ7wWGaW-tbgvgr0LLnAqg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research</a> (PIK) and headed the research group Bayesian Risk Management. Together with colleagues from PIK and IIASA, he conceived the SuperSmart Grid.

Super Smart Energy Grids

In this podcast, Myanna Dellinger interviews Dr. Falk Schmidt on his experience and views regarding water resource management in today's world.  Dr. Falk Schmidt studied at Free University Berlin Philosophy, Business and Law. He got his PhD in Political Sciences, focusing on global freshwater governance. In the past 15 years, he has been working both in academia and the public sector, in Germany and with the United Nations. He joined the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies in 2010 and is currently the leader of an initiative that brings together science, policy and society for the implementation of the sustainable development goals in and by Germany.

In this podcast, <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/de/menschen/dr-falk-schmidt" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dr. Falk Schmidt</a> on his experience and views regarding water resource management in today's world.  Dr. Falk Schmidt studied at Free University Berlin Philosophy, Business and Law. He got his PhD in Political Sciences, focusing on global freshwater governance. In the past 15 years, he has been working both in academia and the public sector, in Germany and with the United Nations. He joined the <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies</a> in 2010 and is currently the leader of an initiative that brings together science, policy and society for the implementation of the sustainable development goals in and by Germany.

Water Resources Management

In this podcast, Myanna Dellinger interviews Craig Morris on his experience and views regarding how the German energy sector transitioned from fossil fuels to modern energy sources through grass-roots movements. The lessons learned have been adopted by other countries and maybe there is hope of using this model for an energy transition in more stubborn countries such as the United States. Craig Morris (@PPchef) is currently a Senior Fellow at the IASS. Coauthored with Arne Jungjohann, his book Energy Democracy is the first history of Germany’s energy transition, the Energiewende. He has served as technical editor of IRENA’s REmap and of Greenpeace’s Energy (R)evolution. In 2008, he cofounded Berlin’s PV Magazine; in 2010, Renewables International. In 2012, he became lead author of EnergyTransition.de. In 2014, he won the International Association of Energy Economists’ prize for energy journalism.

In this podcast, <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/people/craig-morris" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Craig Morris</a> on his experience and views regarding how the German energy sector transitioned from fossil fuels to modern energy sources through grass-roots movements. The lessons learned have been adopted by other countries and maybe there is hope of using this model for an energy transition in more stubborn countries such as the United States. Craig Morris (<a href="https://twitter.com/PPchef" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@PPchef</a>) is currently a Senior Fellow at the <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">IASS</a>. Coauthored with Arne Jungjohann, his book <a href="http://energiewendebook.de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Energy Democracy</a> is the first history of Germany’s energy transition, the Energiewende. He has served as technical editor of IRENA’s REmap and of Greenpeace’s Energy (R)evolution. In 2008, he cofounded Berlin’s PV Magazine; in 2010, Renewables International. In 2012, he became lead author of <a href="http://energytransition.de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">EnergyTransition.de</a>. In 2014, he won the International Association of Energy Economists’ prize for energy journalism.

Transitioning Energy

What can we do today to work toward adequate governance of climate engineering down the road? In this podcast, Myanna Dellinger discusses with Matthias Honegger why governance urgently requires a global conversation open to all, which can help unearth concerns, risks and opportunities associated with various new ways to dealing with climate change in the context of expected future impacts from climate change itself.  After studying environmental system sciences at the Swiss Federal Institute for Technology, Matthias Honegger has been working since the beginning of 2012 on international climate policy in developing countries and on climate negotiations as a consultant for various multilateral organizations and governmental bodies with the consulting firm Perspectives Climate Change (CV). During this time, he has actively followed and contributed to research on climate engineering and its governance and reflected about the climate engineering governance implications of the Paris Agreement (Harvard Viewpoints article). At the 22nd Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change that took place November 2016 in Marrakech, Matthias has participated in what may well be the first serious conversations on this important issue area on the margins of international climate negotiations – including with negotiators representing countries from the global south and north. He also spoke in Marrakech on the need for a global conversation in a panel discussion (video). In his position at the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Matthias Honegger is undertaking social science research on questions regarding governance (mobilizing and regulating negative emissions technologies), and risks in context of direct interventions in the climate system and the growing threat from climate change.

What can we do today to work toward adequate governance of climate engineering down the road? In this podcast, <a href="http://www.professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Myanna Dellinger </a>discusses with Matthias Honegger why governance urgently requires a global conversation open to all, which can help unearth concerns, risks and opportunities associated with various new ways to dealing with climate change in the context of expected future impacts from climate change itself.  After studying environmental system sciences at the Swiss Federal Institute for Technology, Matthias Honegger has been working since the beginning of 2012 on international climate policy in developing countries and on climate negotiations as a consultant for various multilateral organizations and governmental bodies with the consulting firm Perspectives Climate Change (<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2AVovJIGUgVdGgxZTJZbllIUm8/view?usp=sharing" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">CV</a>). During this time, he has actively followed and contributed to research on <a href="http://www.fni.no/getfile.php/132218/Filer/Publikasjoner/FNI-Climate-Policy-Perspectives-5.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">climate engineering</a> and its <a href="http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/cclr2013&amp;div=20&amp;id=&amp;page=" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">governance</a> and reflected about the climate engineering governance implications of the Paris Agreement (<a href="http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/160700_horton-keith-honegger_vp2.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Harvard Viewpoints article</a>). At the 22nd Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change that took place November 2016 in Marrakech, Matthias has participated in what may well be the first serious conversations on this important issue area on the margins of international climate negotiations – including with negotiators representing countries from the global south and north. He also spoke in Marrakech on the need for a global conversation in a panel discussion (<a href="http://unfccc.cloud.streamworld.de/webcast/climate-geoengineering-and-its-governance" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">video</a>). In his <a href="http://www.iass-potsdam.de/en/people/matthias-honegger" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">position</a> at the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Matthias Honegger is undertaking social science research on questions regarding governance (mobilizing and regulating negative emissions technologies), and risks in context of direct interventions in the climate system and the growing threat from climate change.

Climate Geoengineering and Its Governance

In this interview, recorded August 10th, 2016, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Wil Burns on Loss and Damage under the Paris Agreement.  Wil Burns is the Co-Executive Director of the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment in the School of International Service at American University. He formerly directed the Energy Policy &amp; Climate program at Johns Hopkins University, and is the immediate past President of the Association of Environmental Studies &amp; Sciences.  Wil holds a Ph.D. in International Environmental Law from the University of Wales-Cardiff School of Law.  See also:  http://www.dcgeoconsortium.org http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org

In this interview, recorded August 10th, 2016, <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger </a>interviews <a href="http://www.american.edu/sis/faculty/wburns.cfm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Wil Burns</a> on Loss and Damage under the Paris Agreement. Wil Burns is the Co-Executive Director of the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment in the <a href="http://www.american.edu/sis/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">School of International Service</a> at <a href="http://www.american.edu/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">American University.</a> He formerly directed the Energy Policy &amp; Climate program at <a href="https://www.jhu.edu" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Johns Hopkins University</a>, and is the immediate past President of the <a href="https://aessonline.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Association of Environmental Studies &amp; Sciences</a>. Wil holds a Ph.D. in International Environmental Law from the <a href="http://www.law.cardiff.ac.uk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">University of Wales-Cardiff School of Law</a>. See also: <a href="http://www.dcgeoconsortium.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.dcgeoconsortium.org</a> <a href="http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.teachingclimatelaw.org</a>

Loss and Damage under the Paris Agreement

This interview was recorded on July 11th, 2016. Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Rick Reibstein about the problems and issues surrounding the compliance and enforcement of environmental issues.  Rick Reibstein teaches environmental law to nonlawyers at BU and Harvard Extension School.   He spent almost three decades with the state of Massachusetts helping companies and others to comply with environmental rules and go beyond them to reduce the use of toxics, energy and water.   He also spent a few years as an enforcement attorney for the US EPA and the state of Massachusetts, and has worked with both agencies to coordinate assistance and enforcement initiatives, so he brings an unconventional  perspective to the question of enforcement.  Rick has just published a book called Developing Sustainable Environmental Responsibility.

This interview was recorded on July 11th, 2016. <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="http://www.bu.edu/earth/people/faculty/rick-reibstein/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Rick Reibstein</a> about the problems and issues surrounding the compliance and enforcement of environmental issues. Rick Reibstein teaches environmental law to nonlawyers at <a href="http://www.bu.edu/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">BU</a> and <a href="https://www.extension.harvard.edu" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Harvard Extension School</a>. He spent almost three decades with the state of Massachusetts helping companies and others to comply with environmental rules and go beyond them to reduce the use of toxics, energy and water.   He also spent a few years as an enforcement attorney for the <a href="https://www3.epa.gov" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">US EPA </a>and the state of Massachusetts, and has worked with both agencies to coordinate assistance and enforcement initiatives, so he brings an unconventional  perspective to the question of enforcement. Rick has just published a book called <a href="http://www.trunity.com/products/digital-textbooks/developing-sustainable-environmental-responsibility/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Developing Sustainable Environmental Responsibility</a>.

Environmental Compliance and Enforcement in the United States EPA Regime

This interview was recorded on June 9th, 2016. Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Professor of Law Gregory C. Keating of the University of Southern California Gould School of Law about the issues surrounding the Volkswagen Diesel emission scandal.  Professor Keating joined the USC Law faculty in 1991. He teaches torts, legal ethics, and seminars in legal and political philosophy.  He takes an interest in the remedies aspect of the VW “dieselgate” scandal. Professor Keating graduated summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa from Amherst College, and earned an M.A. and a Ph.D. from the department of Politics at Princeton University, where he specialized in legal and political philosophy. He graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. After graduating from Harvard, he practiced law in Massachusetts for five years before joining the USC Law faculty. He has also been a visiting professor at Harvard Law School.  Update: After completing the two interviews on the VW “dieselgate” scandal, VW announced plans to launch 30 all-electric models to reposition itself as a leader in "green" transport.  Matthias Mueller, chief executive of VW, said huge investments would be needed as the firm moves beyond the "dieselgate" scandal.  Mr. Mueller hopes that by 2025, all-electric cars would account for about 20-25% of the German carmaker's annual sales.  This episode was recorded on the campus of Occidental College in Los Angeles.

This interview was recorded on June 9th, 2016. <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger </a>interviews Professor of Law <a href="http://weblaw.usc.edu/faculty/contactInfo.cfm?detailID=226" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gregory C. Keating</a> of the University of Southern California Gould School of Law about the issues surrounding the Volkswagen Diesel emission scandal.  Professor Keating joined the USC Law faculty in 1991. He teaches torts, legal ethics, and seminars in legal and political philosophy.  He takes an interest in the remedies aspect of the VW “dieselgate” scandal. Professor Keating graduated summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa from Amherst College, and earned an M.A. and a Ph.D. from the department of Politics at Princeton University, where he specialized in legal and political philosophy. He graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. After graduating from Harvard, he practiced law in Massachusetts for five years before joining the USC Law faculty. He has also been a visiting professor at Harvard Law School. Update: After completing the two interviews on the VW “dieselgate” scandal, VW <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/business-36548893" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">announced</a> plans to launch 30 all-electric models to reposition itself as a leader in "green" transport.  Matthias Mueller, chief executive of VW, said huge investments would be needed as the firm moves beyond the "dieselgate" scandal.  Mr. Mueller hopes that by 2025, all-electric cars would account for about 20-25% of the German carmaker's annual sales. This episode was recorded on the campus of <a href="http://www.oxy.edu" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Occidental College</a> in Los Angeles.

Volkswagen Emission "Dieselgate" Scandal, Part II

In the first of a two part series,  Professor Dellinger  interviews Björn Fasterling regarding the scandal that has rocked  Volkswagen in what is now being called "Dieselgate". Björn Fasterling is professor of law and the head of the law faculty at EDHEC Business School (Lille &amp; Nice, France). His research and publications focus on ethics and compliance management in companies, and more recently on business and human rights. Prior to joining EDHEC, professor Fasterling practised as a German lawyer in the Berlin office of the Washington DC based law firm WilmerHale   Update: After completing the two interviews on the VW “dieselgate” scandal, VW  announced  plans to launch 30 all-electric models to reposition itself as a leader in "green" transport.  Matthias Mueller, chief executive of VW, said huge investments would be needed as the firm moves beyond the "dieselgate" scandal.  Mr. Mueller hopes that by 2025, all-electric cars would account for about 20-25% of the German carmaker's annual sales. Volkswagen has also agreed  to take a series of steps costing about $10.2 billion to settle claims from its unprecedented diesel emissions cheating scandal in the U.S.

In the first of a two part series,  <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Dellinger</a>  interviews Björn Fasterling regarding the scandal that has rocked  <a href="http://www.vw.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Volkswagen </a>in what is now being called "Dieselgate". Björn Fasterling is professor of law and the head of the law faculty at EDHEC Business School (Lille &amp; Nice, France). His research and publications focus on ethics and compliance management in companies, and more recently on business and human rights. Prior to joining EDHEC, professor Fasterling practised as a German lawyer in the Berlin office of the Washington DC based law firm WilmerHale Update: After completing the two interviews on the VW “dieselgate” scandal, VW  <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/business-36548893" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">announced</a>  plans to launch 30 all-electric models to reposition itself as a leader in "green" transport.  Matthias Mueller, chief executive of VW, said huge investments would be needed as the firm moves beyond the "dieselgate" scandal.  Mr. Mueller hopes that by 2025, all-electric cars would account for about 20-25% of the German carmaker's annual sales. <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/7331e2a146d24645820afa4d4328747b" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Volkswagen has also agreed</a>  to take a series of steps costing about $10.2 billion to settle claims from its unprecedented diesel emissions cheating scandal in the U.S.

Volkswagen Emission "Dieselgate" Scandal, Part I

To avoid the worst effects of climate change, it has become clear that fossil fuels must be left in the ground.  Nuclear power has resurfaced on the scene as a potentially viable energy source after the phase-out of fossil fuels. In this three part-series, you will be able to hear from experts in the field discuss both the pros and cons of nuclear energy and related future energy issues. This is part three of the series. In this part, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Gabrielle Hecht. Gabrielle Hecht is professor of history at the University of Michigan. She is the author of two award-winning books: The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II, first published by MIT Press in 1998 and reissued in 2009, and Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade, which appeared in 2012.   Photo by Fernand Pio

To avoid the worst effects of climate change, it has become clear that fossil fuels must be left in the ground. Nuclear power has resurfaced on the scene as a potentially viable energy source after the phase-out of fossil fuels. In this three part-series, you will be able to hear from experts in the field discuss both the pros and cons of nuclear energy and related future energy issues. This is part three of the series. In this part, <a href="http://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="https://umich.academia.edu/GabrielleHecht" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gabrielle Hecht</a>. Gabrielle Hecht is professor of history at the <a href="https://umich.academia.edu/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">University of Michigan</a>. She is the author of two award-winning books: <a href="http://gabriellehecht.org/books/radiance-of-france/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II</a>, first published by MIT Press in 1998 and reissued in 2009, and <a href="http://gabriellehecht.org/books/being-nuclear/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade</a>, which appeared in 2012. Photo by Fernand Pio

Nuclear Power in France and Beyond, Part III

 To avoid the worst effects of climate change, it has become clear that fossil fuels must be left in the ground. Nuclear power has resurfaced on the scene as a potentially viable energy source after the phase-out of fossil fuels. In this three part-series, you will be able to hear from experts in the field discuss both the pros and cons of nuclear energy and related future energy issues. This is part two of the series. In this part, Professor Dellinger interview Dr Jonathan Cobb. Dr. Cobb is a Senior Communication Manager at the World Nuclear Association, based in London, United Kingdom. Dr Cobb began his career working in R&amp;D for British Nuclear Fuels before focusing on climate change, sustainable development and energy policy. He joined the World Nuclear Association in 2005 as their advisor on climate change. He has represented the World Nuclear Association at the UNFCCC climate change meetings since 1999 and most recently attended COP 21 in Paris in 2015. Thanks for listening!  Myanna Dellinger  Associate Professor of Law University of South Dakota School of Law

To avoid the worst effects of climate change, it has become clear that fossil fuels must be left in the ground. Nuclear power has resurfaced on the scene as a potentially viable energy source after the phase-out of fossil fuels. In this three part-series, you will be able to hear from experts in the field discuss both the pros and cons of nuclear energy and related future energy issues. This is part two of the series. In this part, <a href="https://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Dellinger</a> interview <a href="mailto:info@world-nuclear.org">Dr Jonathan Cobb</a>. Dr. Cobb is a Senior Communication Manager at the <a href="http://world-nuclear.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">World Nuclear Association</a>, based in London, United Kingdom. Dr Cobb began his career working in R&amp;D for British Nuclear Fuels before focusing on climate change, sustainable development and energy policy. He joined the World Nuclear Association in 2005 as their advisor on climate change. He has represented the World Nuclear Association at the <a href="http://www.unfccc.int" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">UNFCCC</a> climate change meetings since 1999 and most recently attended <a href="http://www.cop21paris.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">COP 21</a> in Paris in 2015. Thanks for listening! <a href="http://www.professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Myanna Dellinger</a> Associate Professor of Law University of South Dakota School of Law

Nuclear Power in France and Beyond, Part II

The Global Energy & Environmental Law Podcast

To avoid the worst effects of climate change, it has become clear that fossil fuels must be left in the ground.  Nuclear power has resurfaced on the scene as a potentially viable energy source after the phase-out of fossil fuels. In this three part-series, you will be able to hear from experts in the field discuss both the pros and cons of nuclear energy and related future energy issues.In part one, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Mycle Schneider, an independent international analyst and consultant on energy and nuclear policy based in Paris, France. Mr. Schneider is the convening lead author and publisher of the annual World Nuclear Industry Status Report.  Energy visionary Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute has called this report “a vital public service”.  Mycle initiated the Seoul International Energy Advisory Council, appointed by the Mayor of Seoul, and serves as its coordinator. This experience led to the founding of the International Energy Advisory Council,incorporated in the US which Mycle represents as spokesperson. Mycle has advised the Belgian, French and German governments as well as international and academic institutions, NGOs, think tanks and media. Photo: ©Serge Ollivier

To avoid the worst effects of climate change, it has become clear that fossil fuels must be left in the ground.  Nuclear power has resurfaced on the scene as a potentially viable energy source after the phase-out of fossil fuels. In this three part-series, you will be able to hear from experts in the field discuss both the pros and cons of nuclear energy and related future energy issues.In part one, <a href="https://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews Mycle Schneider, an independent international analyst and consultant on energy and nuclear policy based in Paris, France. Mr. Schneider is the convening lead author and publisher of the annual <a href="http://www.worldnuclearreport.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">World Nuclear Industry Status Report</a>.  Energy visionary Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute has called this report “a vital public service”.  Mycle initiated the Seoul International Energy Advisory Council, appointed by the Mayor of Seoul, and serves as its coordinator. This experience led to the founding of the <a href="www.IEAC.info" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">International Energy Advisory Council</a>,incorporated in the US which Mycle represents as spokesperson. Mycle has advised the Belgian, French and German governments as well as international and academic institutions, NGOs, think tanks and media.   Photo: ©Serge Ollivier

Nuclear Power in France and Beyond

Does anyone have legal rights to “the atmosphere” and thus a stable climate?  Professor of Law Mary Wood argues that governments in the United States and abroad hold the atmosphere in trust for the general public and are thus accountable for reducing carbon pollution to protect the climate for current and future generations. Tracing the origin of the well-established public trust doctrine to Roman law, Professor Wood discusses with Associate Professor of Law Myanna Dellinger how this enduring principle of law has resulted in judges requiring governments to protect, for exampe, rivers, lakes and oceanfronts.  Professor Wood explains how some NGOs have recently brought suit under the public trust doctrine for government-scale failures to mitigate climate change through legislative or regulatory action and explains why this is sound policy in the nick of time.

Does anyone have legal rights to “the atmosphere” and thus a stable climate?  <a href="http://law.uoregon.edu/faculty/mwood/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor of Law Mary Wood</a> argues that governments in the United States and abroad hold the atmosphere in trust for the general public and are thus accountable for reducing carbon pollution to protect the climate for current and future generations. Tracing the origin of the well-established public trust doctrine to Roman law, Professor Wood discusses with <a href="http://www.professordellinger.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Associate Professor of Law Myanna Dellinger</a> how this enduring principle of law has resulted in judges requiring governments to protect, for exampe, rivers, lakes and oceanfronts.  Professor Wood explains how some NGOs have recently brought suit under the public trust doctrine for government-scale failures to mitigate climate change through legislative or regulatory action and explains why this is sound policy in the nick of time.

Atmospheric Trust Litigation

On March 1, 2015, a group of experts in international law, human rights law, environmental law, and other law adopted the Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change. These experts came from national and international courts, universities and organizations located around the world. In part one of two podcasts on the Oslo Principles, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Michael Gerrard, Andrew Sabin Professor of Professional Practice and Director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School in New York.  Professor Gerrard is a world-renowned expert on environmental law and in particular climate change law. Part two will consist of an interview with  Philip Sutherland, a professor at the Stellenbosch University Faculty of Law in South Africa who also contributed to the formulation of the Oslo Principles.

On March 1, 2015, a group of experts in international law, human rights law, environmental law, and other law adopted the <a href="http://www.yale.edu/macmillan/globaljustice/OsloPrinciples.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change</a>. These experts came from national and international courts, universities and organizations located around the world.   In part one of two podcasts on the Oslo Principles, <a href="https://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Michael_Gerrard" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Michael Gerrard</a>, Andrew Sabin Professor of Professional Practice and Director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School in New York.  Professor Gerrard is a world-renowned expert on environmental law and in particular climate change law.   Part two will consist of an interview with  <a href="http://blogs.sun.ac.za/law/staff/handelsreg-mercantile-law/prof-philip-sutherland/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Philip Sutherland</a>, a professor at the Stellenbosch University Faculty of Law in South Africa who also contributed to the formulation of the Oslo Principles.

The Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations

On March 1, 2015, a group of experts in international law, human rights law, environmental law, and other law adopted the  Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change. These experts came from national and international courts, universities and organizations located around the world.  In part two of two podcasts on the Oslo Principles, Professor Myanna Dellinger interviews Philip Sutherland, a Professor at the Stellenbosch University Faculty of Law in South Africa.  Professor Sutherland was one of 13 experts contributing to the recent formulation of the “Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations” and will be adding his insight to the previous comments by Professor Gerrard on the Principles.  Prof Sutherland teaches and researches in the areas of corporate, competition and financial services law. He has published more than 35 articles and chapters in books in these fields.  His main focus is currently the broader societal impacts of business activities.

On March 1, 2015, a group of experts in international law, human rights law, environmental law, and other law adopted the  <a href="http://www.yale.edu/macmillan/globaljustice/OsloPrinciples.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change</a>. These experts came from national and international courts, universities and organizations located around the world.  In part two of two podcasts on the Oslo Principles, <a href="https://professordellinger.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Professor Myanna Dellinger</a> interviews <a href="http://blogs.sun.ac.za/law/staff/handelsreg-mercantile-law/prof-philip-sutherland/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Philip Sutherland</a>, a Professor at the <a href="http://blogs.sun.ac.za/law/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Stellenbosch University Faculty of Law</a> in South Africa.  Professor Sutherland was one of 13 experts contributing to the recent formulation of the “Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations” and will be adding his insight to the previous comments by Professor Gerrard on the Principles.  Prof Sutherland teaches and researches in the areas of corporate, competition and financial services law. He has published more than 35 articles and chapters in books in these fields.  His main focus is currently the broader societal impacts of business activities.

The Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations - part 2

The Best Multi-Part Documentaries, with documentaries on Obama, Federer vs Nadal, the making of Star Wars, Netflix vs Blockbuster and more. Add episodes you're interested into your queue below!

Best Multi-Part Documentaries

The best podcast episodes on parenting. Interviewing experts and talking through common issues surrounding parenting. This topic is filled with important lessons and insights for anyone listening. Add episodes you're interested into your queue below!