Carter G. Phillips presents the arguments for the petitioners. Mr. Phillips is a partner at Sidley Austin LLP.

Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: Arguments for Petitioners

Mary R. O'Grady presents the arguments for the respondent. Ms. O'Grady is the Solicitor General of Arizona.

Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: Arguments for Respondent

Helen Norton, University of Colorado Law School, counsel to amici National Women’s Law Center et al., presents arguments for petitioner. Professor Norton is counsel to amici National Women’s Law Center et al.

Thompson v. North American Stainless: Arguments for petitioner

Leigh Latherow, VanAntwerp, Monge, Jones, Edwards &amp; McCann, LLP presents arguments for respondent. Ms. Latherow is counsel to respondent North American Stainless, LP.,

Thompson v. North American Stainless: Arguments for respondent

Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin LLP, presents arguments for appellants. Mr. Phillips is counsel to appellant Arnold Schwarzenegger

Schwarzenegger v. Plata: Arguments for appellants

Paul D. Clement, King &amp; Spalding LLP, presents arguments for appellees.  Mr. Clement is counsel to appellee Ralph Coleman.

Schwarzenegger v. Plata: Arguments for appellees

David A. Cortman, Alliance Defense Fund, presents arguments for petitioner. Mr. Cortman is lead counsel for petitioner Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization

Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn: Arguments for Petitioners

Francisco M. Negrón, Associate Executive Director &amp; General Counsel, National School Boards Association, presents arguments for respondents. The National School Boards Association filed an amicus brief in the case.

Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn: Arguments for Respondents

Paul M. Smith, Jenner &amp; Block, presents arguments for respondent. Mr. Smith is also arguing counsel for respondent

Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants : Arguments for Respondent

S. Kyle Duncan, Appellate Chief, Louisiana Department of Justice presents the arguments for petitioner.  Mr. Duncan represents amici Lousiana et al. in support of petitioner

Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants : Arguments for Petitioner

Podcasts originally published on SCOTUSblog, a blog written by lawyers, students, and journalists devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States

I put up a 1-star review recently and now (miraculously) it had disappeared.

Still appalled at the behavior of the two children who host this podcast. Expecting a serious, analytical podcast about SCOTUS, I am treated to a rambling, misogynistic self-indulgent waste of my time.

You took my review down

SCOTUSblog Podcast

SCOTUSblog interviews trial lawyer and legal historian Ed Mannino about his book, Shaping America: The Supreme Court and American Society, a comprehensive history of the Supreme Court.

Shaping America podcast with Ed Mannino

Skinner v. Switzer

Edward C. Dawson presents the arguments for the respondent. Mr. Dawson is a Partner at Yetter Coleman LLP.  Note: We had also planned (and hoped) to have counsel for petitioner Henry Skinner participate in the podcast, but at the last minute he was unable to do so.  Thus, unlike earlier podcasts, this podcast features only counsel for the respondent, which we are posting without regard to her likelihood of success in the case.

Skinner v. Switzer: Arguments for Respondent

Snyder v. Phelps

Margie J. Phelps presents the arguments for respondent. Ms. Phelps is also arguing counsel for respondent.

Snyder v. Phelps: Arguments for Respondent

Judge Michael McConnell, who argued before the Supreme Court, gives the arguments on the petitioner's side.

Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: Arguments for Petitioner

Paul Smith, representing the amicus party Hastings Outlaw, gives the arguments on the respondents' side.

Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: Arguments for Respondents

Prof. John Blume, representing the amicus party the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, gives the arguments on the criminal defendant's side.

Magwood v. Patterson: Arguments for Petitioner

Clarence Thomas

SCOTUSblog interviews Prof. David Stras on his experience clerking for Justice Thomas.

Interview with David Stras, Former Clarence Thomas Clerk

Prof. Peter Margulies, representing the amicus party “Scholars, Attorneys, and Former Public Officials with Experience in Terrorism-Related Issues," gives the arguments for the government.

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project: Arguments for the Petitioners

Jack Greenberg

Jack Greenberg discusses the experience of arguing Brown v. Board of Education, and the meaning of the decision.

Jack Greenberg on Brown v. Board of Education

Nina Totenberg

Nina Totenberg introduces her three-part series of recordings on the case for NPR.

Nina Totenberg on Brown v. Board of Education

Erwin Chemerinsky

University of California, Irvine law school dean Erwin Chemerinsky discusses segregation today in American public schools and the Court's rulings on desegregation and integration programs.

Erwin Chemerinsky on the Supreme Court and Re-Segregation

David Cecelski

SCOTUSblog interviews historian David Cecelski about the consequences of the Brown v. Board of Education decision.

David Cecelski: The Unexpected Consequences of Brown v. Board of Education

Vernon Jordan

Tom Goldstein interviews Vernon Jordan about the impact of the Court on the black community.

Interview with Vernon Jordan

Arguments for the petitioner in the Supreme Court case American Needle v. NFL.  The speaker is Meir Feder of Jones Day, counsel to American Needle.

American Needle v. NFL: Counsel for American Needle

Arguments for the respondent in American Needle v. NFL.  The speaker is Shepard Goldfein of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher &amp; Flom, representing the National hockey League as amicus curiae.

American Needle v. NFL: Counsel Supporting the NFL

Tom Goldstein interviews Joan Biskupic about her 2009 biography of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Biskupic Interview

The best podcast episodes on non-current politics. Covering topics such as universal basic income, democracy, poverty & justice and more. For anyone interested in learning more about politics that affect that world, not just now, but in the longer term. Add episodes you're interested into your queue below!

Best Non-Current Politics Podcasts

The best self improvement podcast episodes. From improving productivity, to finding purpose in your life to what constitutes freedom, this topic is on anything and everything that can help people to improve their lives. Add episodes you're interested into your queue below!