Vera Cherepanova's guest appearances

Vera Cherepanova

FCPA Compliance Report

Innovation in Compliance with Tom Fox

Sean Freidlin

Sheila Hooda

Jesse Caplan

Scott Schneider

Brandon Daniels

Kristy Grant-Hart

Ben Locwin

Philip Winterburn

David Bunker

James Gellert

Amy Edmondson

Brian Beeghly

Eric Feldman

Erica Salmon Byrne

Sam Silverstein

OwlTail

Tom Fox welcomes back Vera Cherepanova on this episode of the Innovation in Compliance Podcast. Vera is an ethics advocate, consultant, author and speaker. She joins Tom to talk about behavioral risks, the steps behavioral scientists take to analyze risk, and strategies from financial institutions that other industries can use.Behavioral Risk in The Banking SectorBehavioral risk is more or less the same across every industry. What is specific to the financial industry however, and banking in particular, is that the individuals work with money. This creates higher risk as the outcomes can be more immediately seen and felt by the customers. The Regulator's Role"The regulator has a very limited role in mandating culture because no regulator can mandate what kind of a culture and organization needs to have," Vera begins. The compliance regulator can mandate what the culture is, but how that corporate culture is going to be in reality will not be up to them. Speaking specifically of the UK and the Netherlands, Vera expresses that the regulators in these regions have played a largely educational role in the business industries. She gives Tom a few examples of the events the regulators have done in these regions.Assessing Behavioural RiskTom asks Vera to talk about some of the practical steps behavioral scientists take when analyzing behavioral risk. Vera cautions that the first thing to understand when applying behavioral science is that interventions don't always work. The first thing that scientists do is assess risk using a method called ethnography. They want to understand what is really happening inside organizational teams. They focus on subcultures, and then compare that against what is written in policies and regulations. Holistic cultural assessments aren't done as behavioral scientists concentrate on specific teams. Surveys are also only used to categorize the data the scientists have collected, and to generalize some of their observations. Strategies To EmulateThe methods financial institutions use to conduct audits are accessible for any industry. Looking into behavioral risk on top of a risk management framework is one concept that can be emulated across industries, as well as using subculture audits. These skills will be modified for each industry but Vera remarks that the basic concepts will be the same across the board.ResourcesVera Cherepanova | LinkedIn Studio EticaEuropean Banks Are Behavioral Risk Pioneers. No, Really. 

Tom Fox welcomes back Vera Cherepanova on this episode of the Innovation in Compliance Podcast. Vera is an ethics advocate, consultant, author and speaker. She joins Tom to talk about behavioral risks, the steps behavioral scientists take to analyze risk, and strategies from financial institutions that other industries can use. Behavioral Risk in The Banking SectorBehavioral risk is more or less the same across every industry. What is specific to the financial industry however, and banking in particular, is that the individuals work with money. This creates higher risk as the outcomes can be more immediately seen and felt by the customers.  The Regulator's Role"The regulator has a very limited role in mandating culture because no regulator can mandate what kind of a culture and organization needs to have," Vera begins. The compliance regulator can mandate what the culture is, but how that corporate culture is going to be in reality will not be up to them. Speaking specifically of the UK and the Netherlands, Vera expresses that the regulators in these regions have played a largely educational role in the business industries. She gives Tom a few examples of the events the regulators have done in these regions. Assessing Behavioural RiskTom asks Vera to talk about some of the practical steps behavioral scientists take when analyzing behavioral risk. Vera cautions that the first thing to understand when applying behavioral science is that interventions don't always work. The first thing that scientists do is assess risk using a method called ethnography. They want to understand what is really happening inside organizational teams. They focus on subcultures, and then compare that against what is written in policies and regulations. Holistic cultural assessments aren't done as behavioral scientists concentrate on specific teams. Surveys are also only used to categorize the data the scientists have collected, and to generalize some of their observations.  Strategies To EmulateThe methods financial institutions use to conduct audits are accessible for any industry. Looking into behavioral risk on top of a risk management framework is one concept that can be emulated across industries, as well as using subculture audits. These skills will be modified for each industry but Vera remarks that the basic concepts will be the same across the board. ResourcesVera Cherepanova | <a href="https://it.linkedin.com/in/veracherepanova" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a> <a href="https://www.studioetica.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Studio Etica</a><a href="https://fcpablog.com/2022/01/17/european-banks-are-behavioral-risk-pioneers-no-really/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">European Banks Are Behavioral Risk Pioneers. No, Really</a>.

A Behavioral Approach to Risk Management with Vera Cherepanova

In this episode I visit with Vera Cherepanova author of the book, “Compliance Program of an Organisation”. We visit about her recent article on the FCPA Blog and its implication. Some of the highlights from the podcast include: 1.     Cherepanova’s unique professional background. 2.     What led to her to pen the recent article in the FCPA Blog, “Who's to blame? The bad apple or the barrel?”3.     What are the differences in the ‘situation perspective’ and the ‘personality perspective’?4.     How do group dynamics inform corporate decision making?5.     How can a compliance program be designed to prevent nefarious group think which might lead to bribery and corruption?6.     Why is the myth of the rogue employee just that, a myth? Resources: FCPA Blog post “Who's to blame? The bad apple or the barrel?”Studio Etica websiteLinkedIn Profile Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode I visit with Vera Cherepanova author of the book, “Compliance Program of an Organisation”. We visit about her recent article on the FCPA Blog and its implication. Some of the highlights from the podcast include: 1.     Cherepanova’s unique professional background. 2.     What led to her to pen the recent article in the FCPA Blog, “<a href="http://www.fcpablog.com/blog/2019/2/14/whos-to-blame-the-bad-apple-or-the-barrel.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Who's to blame? The bad apple or the barrel?</a>”3.     What are the differences in the ‘situation perspective’ and the ‘personality perspective’?4.     How do group dynamics inform corporate decision making?5.     How can a compliance program be designed to prevent nefarious group think which might lead to bribery and corruption?6.     Why is the myth of the rogue employee just that, a myth? Resources: FCPA Blog post “<a href="http://www.fcpablog.com/blog/2019/2/14/whos-to-blame-the-bad-apple-or-the-barrel.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Who's to blame? The bad apple or the barrel?</a>”<a href="https://www.studioetica.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Studio Etica website</a><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/veracherepanova/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">LinkedIn Profile</a> Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a>

FCPA Compliance Report-Episode 422, Vera Cherepanova