Robin Effron's guest appearances

Robin Effron

Ipse Dixit

John Newman

Tim Schneider

Eric Goldman

Carrie Goldberg

Lawrence Lessig

Nicholas Bagley

Heidi Matthews

Leigh Goodmark

Todd Zywicki

Simon Tam

Greg Shill

Adam Winkler

Patrick O'Donnell

David Ley

Ben Carter

OwlTail

In this episode, Robin Effron, Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, discusses her article "Putting the 'Notice' Back Into Pleading," which will be published in the Cardozo Law Review. Effron begins by explaining what pleading is and what a plaintiff is expected to plead under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in order to survive a motion to dismiss. She describes the origins of what came to be known as "notice pleading" and how it developed over time. She observes that notice pleading effectively conflates notice and factual sufficiency, and argues that we should conceptualize them separately in order to better understand and realize the purpose of our pleading regime. Effron is on Twitter at @binsky18.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="https://www.brooklaw.edu/Contact-Us/Effron-Robin" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Robin Effron</a>, Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, discusses her article "<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3483680" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Putting the 'Notice' Back Into Pleading</a>," which will be published in the Cardozo Law Review. Effron begins by explaining what pleading is and what a plaintiff is expected to plead under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in order to survive a motion to dismiss. She describes the origins of what came to be known as "notice pleading" and how it developed over time. She observes that notice pleading effectively conflates notice and factual sufficiency, and argues that we should conceptualize them separately in order to better understand and realize the purpose of our pleading regime. Effron is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/binsky18" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@binsky18</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/brianlfrye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@brianlfrye</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Robin Effron on Notice Pleading

In this episode, Robin J. Effron, Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, discusses her article "Trade Secrets, Extraterritoriality, and Jurisdiction," which was published in the Wake Forest Law Review. Effron begins by describing what trade secrets are and how Congress has recently created and expanded federal trade secret protection, ostensibly in response to foreign trade secret misappropriation. She explains how constitutional limitations on federal jurisdiction could make it difficult to use these new trade secret protections against foreign defendants, specifically noting the irony that many of the same people who argued for the expansion of trade secret rights also argued for the limitations on jurisdiction that could make enforcement of those rights difficult. And she speculates that the real target of federal trade secret law was not foreign misappropriators, but domestic ones, specifically former employees. Effron is on Twitter at @binsky18. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="https://www.brooklaw.edu/faculty/directory/facultymember/biography.aspx?id=robin.effron" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Robin J. Effron</a>, Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, discusses her article "<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2896137" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Trade Secrets, Extraterritoriality, and Jurisdiction</a>," which was published in the Wake Forest Law Review. Effron begins by describing what trade secrets are and how Congress has recently created and expanded federal trade secret protection, ostensibly in response to foreign trade secret misappropriation. She explains how constitutional limitations on federal jurisdiction could make it difficult to use these new trade secret protections against foreign defendants, specifically noting the irony that many of the same people who argued for the expansion of trade secret rights also argued for the limitations on jurisdiction that could make enforcement of those rights difficult. And she speculates that the real target of federal trade secret law was not foreign misappropriators, but domestic ones, specifically former employees. Effron is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/binsky18" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@binsky18</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Robin Effron on Jurisdictional Limits on Trade Secret Enforcement