Philip Hackney's guest appearances

Philip Hackney

Ipse Dixit

John Newman

Tim Schneider

Eric Goldman

Carrie Goldberg

Lawrence Lessig

Nicholas Bagley

Heidi Matthews

Leigh Goodmark

Todd Zywicki

Simon Tam

Greg Shill

Adam Winkler

Patrick O'Donnell

David Ley

Ben Carter

OwlTail

In this episode, Philip Hackney, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, discusses his draft article "Dark Democracy? Section 501(c)(4) Social Welfare Organizations and Tax Exemption." Hackney begins by describing the difference between outcome-based and process-based theories of political legitimacy. He argues that we should care about process, and explains how nonprofit organizations can affect the democratic process. He identifies the differences between 501(c)(3) charitable organization and 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, and explains how 501(c)(4)s are used for political purposes. He argues that their tax-exempt status is an undemocratic subsidy that should be eliminated, and reflects on the wisdom of exemption in general. Hackney is on Twitter at @EOTaxProf.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="https://www.law.pitt.edu/people/philip-hackney" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Philip Hackney</a>, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, discusses his draft article "Dark Democracy? Section 501(c)(4) Social Welfare Organizations and Tax Exemption." Hackney begins by describing the difference between outcome-based and process-based theories of political legitimacy. He argues that we should care about process, and explains how nonprofit organizations can affect the democratic process. He identifies the differences between 501(c)(3) charitable organization and 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, and explains how 501(c)(4)s are used for political purposes. He argues that their tax-exempt status is an undemocratic subsidy that should be eliminated, and reflects on the wisdom of exemption in general. Hackney is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/EOTaxProf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@EOTaxProf</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/brianlfrye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@brianlfrye</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Philip Hackney on Democracy and Social Welfare Organizations