Benjamin Means's guest appearances

Benjamin Means

Business Divorce Roundtable 

Business Scholarship Podcast

Boardroom Governance with Evan Epstein

Steve Robinson

Yonah Freemark

Rebecca Jarvis

Brian Frye

Hilary Allen

Michael Milken

Patrick Bolton

David Hoffman

Andrew Baker

Robert Anderson

John Coyle

Spencer Williams

Gregory Burke

Chris Mercer

John Cunningham

OwlTail

Douglas Moll

0:00 -- Intro. 1:38 -- Start of interview. 2:31 -- Benjamin Mean's "origin story."  He is a Professor of Law and the John T. Campbell Chair in Business and Professional Ethics at the University of South Carolina School of Law. 4:14 -- On family businesses, legal education and the Family and Small Business Program at the University of South Carolina School of Law. 5:55 -- Douglas Moll's "origin story."  He is the Beirne, Maynard &amp; Parsons, L.L.P. Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center.  9:41 -- Most corporations in the US are closely held. [There are 33.2 million small businesses in the US, which account for 99.9% of all US businesses (SBA, 2022). The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines a small business as a firm that has fewer than 500 employees.] [Half of all U.S. employees work for small businesses.] Moll: "Think of business organizations on a spectrum: on one end of the spectrum you have public corporations, on the other end you have a wide range of corporations whose stock is not publicly traded." 12:37 -- Definition of a "closely held corporation": "It's a surprisingly not easy to answer question." "The easiest way to define a closely held corporation is to say that it is a corporation whose stock is not traded on a public market." It is typically taught to have three elements: 1) no market, 2) having a small number of shareholders, and 3) most shareholders also participate in management. 14:36-- On the classic problem of minority shareholder oppression in closely held corporations. Also referred to "freeze-outs" or "squeeze-outs." "A controlling owner typically makes all the decisions, controls the company, and there is no exit because of a lack of a market." (Oppressive behaviors are sometimes referred to as freeze-out or squeeze-out tactics, all synonyms.) "The classic freeze-out/oppression problem is that the majority denies the minority shareholder of both financial rights and participatory rights." 20:55 -- How these problems have been solved ex-ante (contractual arrangements). 22:58-- On ex-post solutions (as a matter of equity, common law fiduciary duty protection or statutory oppression protection). "In the US, depending how you count them, there are about 40 states that have a statute that allows a minority shareholder to seek the dissolution of a company or some other less drastic relief such as a buyout on the grounds of oppressive conduct by the directors or those in control." "There are another dozen states (and some allow both) that provide relief to minority shareholders via the rubric of fiduciary duties owed by controlling shareholders." 26:46 -- On the jurisprudence on oppressive conduct, particularly since the Donahue v Rodd case, 367 Mass. 578 (Mass. 1975) 328 N.E.2d 505. 29:19 -- On the influence of F Hodge O'Neal and his treatise on Oppression of Minority Shareholders (first published in 1961). 31:29  -- On the "Reasonable Expectation" approach. "It's now the dominant approach when a court is evaluating a shareholder dispute in closely held corporations." What does "oppressive conduct" mean.  35:39  -- On conflict of interest transactions and related-party transactions. "Most states regulate these transactions, they are not per se illegal, but require more scrutiny. They typically require all material information to be fully disclosed and: 1) approved by disinterested directors, or 2) approved by disinterested shareholders; or 3) they must be fair (to be decided by a judge or jury)." 39:58  -- On the lack of independent directors in closely held corporations, and hence lack of deference to the business judgment rule. 43:51  -- On litigation in closely held corporations: "Most disputes litigated in jurisdictions (outside of Delaware) involve closely held corporations." 46:10 -- On Ben and Doug's latest paper: Against Contractual Formalism in Shareholder Oppression Law, U.C. Davis L. Rev. __ (forthcoming 2023). 49:30  -- Other important issues to highlight for directors of closely held corporations. Per Doug Moll: "The business judgment rule might not protect you in all scenarios." "There is a whole specialty around contractual protections in closely held corporations." Per Benjamin Means: "Directors have to think about oppression issues in M&amp;A deals involving closely held corporations." 52:40 -- What are the 1-3 books that have greatly influenced your life:  Doug: Academic work: Oppression of Minority Shareholders by F.Hodge O'Neal &amp; Thomson Treatise.Non-academic books: Dave Eggers and children's books that he read to his kids (Mr. Happy). Ben: Isaiah Berlin's "Value Pluralism" 55:04 -- Who were your mentors, and what did you learn from them? Doug: his colleagues collectively.Ben: Douglas Moll! 56:48 -- Are there any quotes you think of often or live your life by?  Ben: "Don't ask, don't get" by Judge William B. Traxler, Jr.Doug: "It's either good or it's a good story."  58:14 -  An unusual habit or an absurd thing that they love:  Ben: daughter singing Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight) from listening to Mamma Mia! Doug: Pickle ball. 01:00:15-  The living person they most admire: Ben: Judge Rosemary S. Pooler. Benjamin Mean is a Professor of Law and the John T. Campbell Chair in Business and Professional Ethics at the University of South Carolina School of Law. Douglas Moll is the Beirne, Maynard &amp; Parsons, L.L.P. Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center.  __  You can follow Evan on social media at: Twitter: @evanepstein LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/  Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/ __ Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

0:00 -- Intro. 1:38 -- Start of interview. 2:31 -- <a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/law/faculty_and_staff/directory/means_benjamin.php" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Benjamin Mean</a>'s "origin story."  He is a Professor of Law and the John T. Campbell Chair in Business and Professional Ethics at the University of South Carolina School of Law. 4:14 -- On family businesses, legal education and the Family and Small Business Program at the University of South Carolina School of Law. 5:55 -- <a href="https://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/main.asp?PID=25" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Douglas Moll</a>'s "origin story."  He is the Beirne, Maynard &amp; Parsons, L.L.P. Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center.  9:41 -- Most corporations in the US are closely held. [There are 33.2 million small businesses in the US, which account for 99.9% of all US businesses (SBA, 2022). The <a href="https://www.sba.gov/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Small Business Administration (SBA)</a> defines a small business as a firm that has fewer than 500 employees.] [Half of all U.S. employees work for small businesses.] Moll: "Think of business organizations on a spectrum: on one end of the spectrum you have public corporations, on the other end you have a wide range of corporations whose stock is not publicly traded." 12:37 -- Definition of a "closely held corporation": "It's a surprisingly not easy to answer question." "The easiest way to define a closely held corporation is to say that it is a corporation whose stock is not traded on a public market." It is typically taught to have three elements: 1) no market, 2) having a small number of shareholders, and 3) most shareholders also participate in management. 14:36-- On the classic problem of minority shareholder oppression in closely held corporations. Also referred to "freeze-outs" or "squeeze-outs." "A controlling owner typically makes all the decisions, controls the company, and there is no exit because of a lack of a market." (Oppressive behaviors are sometimes referred to as freeze-out or squeeze-out tactics, all synonyms.)  "The classic freeze-out/oppression problem is that the majority denies the minority shareholder of both financial rights and participatory rights." 20:55 -- How these problems have been solved ex-ante (contractual arrangements). 22:58-- On ex-post solutions (as a matter of equity, common law fiduciary duty protection or statutory oppression protection). "In the US, depending how you count them, there are about 40 states that have a statute that allows a minority shareholder to seek the dissolution of a company or some other less drastic relief such as a buyout on the grounds of oppressive conduct by the directors or those in control." "There are another dozen states (and some allow both) that provide relief to minority shareholders via the rubric of fiduciary duties owed by controlling shareholders." 26:46 -- On the jurisprudence on oppressive conduct, particularly since the <a href="https://casetext.com/case/donahue-v-rodd-electrotype-co-of-new-england-inc" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Donahue v Rodd case</a>, 367 Mass. 578 (Mass. 1975) 328 N.E.2d 505. 29:19 -- On the influence of <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/24/obituaries/f-hodge-o-neal-73-ex-law-school-dean.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">F Hodge O'Neal </a>and his treatise on <a href="https://store.legal.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/Treatises/ONeal-and-Thompsons-Oppression-of-Minority-Shareholders-and-LLC-Members-Rev-2d/p/100027755" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Oppression of Minority Shareholders</a> (first published in 1961). 31:29  -- On the "Reasonable Expectation" approach. "It's now the dominant approach when a court is evaluating a shareholder dispute in closely held corporations." What does "oppressive conduct" mean.  35:39  -- On conflict of interest transactions and related-party transactions. "Most states regulate these transactions, they are not per se illegal, but require more scrutiny. They typically require all material information to be fully disclosed and: 1) approved by disinterested directors, or 2) approved by disinterested shareholders; or 3) they must be fair (to be decided by a judge or jury)." 39:58  -- On the lack of independent directors in closely held corporations, and hence lack of deference to the business judgment rule. 43:51  -- On litigation in closely held corporations: "Most disputes litigated in jurisdictions (outside of Delaware) involve closely held corporations." 46:10 -- On Ben and Doug's latest paper: Against Contractual Formalism in Shareholder Oppression Law, U.C. Davis L. Rev. __ (forthcoming 2023). 49:30  -- Other important issues to highlight for directors of closely held corporations. Per Doug Moll: "The business judgment rule might not protect you in all scenarios." "There is a whole specialty around contractual protections in closely held corporations." Per Benjamin Means: "Directors have to think about oppression issues in M&amp;A deals involving closely held corporations." 52:40 -- What are the 1-3 books that have greatly influenced your life:  Doug: <ol><li>Academic work: <a href="https://store.legal.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/Treatises/ONeal-and-Thompsons-Oppression-of-Minority-Shareholders-and-LLC-Members-Rev-2d/p/100027755" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Oppression of Minority Shareholders</a> by F.Hodge O'Neal &amp; Thomson Treatise.</li><li>Non-academic books: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Eggers" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dave Eggers</a> and children's books that he read to his kids (<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Mr-Happy-Roger-Hargreaves/dp/1405289260" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Mr. Happy</a>).</li></ol> Ben: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaiah_Berlin" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Isaiah Berlin</a>'s "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_pluralism" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Value Pluralism</a>" 55:04 -- Who were your mentors, and what did you learn from them? <ol><li>Doug: his colleagues collectively.</li><li>Ben: Douglas Moll!</li></ol> 56:48 -- Are there any quotes you think of often or live your life by?  <ol><li>Ben: "Don't ask, don't get" by <a href="https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/judges/judges-of-the-court/senior-judge-william-b-traxler-jr-" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Judge William B. Traxler, Jr.</a></li><li>Doug: "It's either good or it's a good story." </li></ol> 58:14 -  An unusual habit or an absurd thing that they love:  <ol><li>Ben: daughter singing Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight) from listening to Mamma Mia! </li><li>Doug: Pickle ball.</li></ol> 01:00:15-  The living person they most admire: <ol><li>Ben: <a href="https://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/Judges/bios/rsp.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Judge Rosemary S. Pooler</a>.</li></ol> <a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/law/faculty_and_staff/directory/means_benjamin.php" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Benjamin Mean</a> is a Professor of Law and the John T. Campbell Chair in Business and Professional Ethics at the University of South Carolina School of Law. <a href="https://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/main.asp?PID=25" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Douglas Moll</a> is the Beirne, Maynard &amp; Parsons, L.L.P. Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center.  __  You can follow Evan on social media at: Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/evanepstein" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@evanepstein</a> LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ </a> Substack: <a href="https://evanepstein.substack.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://evanepstein.substack.com/</a> __ Music/Soundtrack (found via <a href="https://freemusicarchive.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Free Music Archive</a>): Seeing The Future by <a href="https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Dexter_Britain/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dexter Britain </a>is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License</a>

Benjamin Means and Douglas Moll: Governance in Closely Held Corporations.

Benjamin Means, professor of law at the University of South Carolina, joins the Business Scholarship Podcast to discuss his article Solving the 'King Lear Problem', which recasts the story of King Lear as a case study on business succession, corporate governance, and fiduciary duty. This episode is hosted by Andrew Jennings, a teaching fellow and lecturer in law at Stanford Law School.

<a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/law/faculty_and_staff/directory/means_benjamin.php" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Benjamin Means</a>, professor of law at the University of South Carolina, joins the <a href="https://andrewkjennings.com/podcast" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Business Scholarship Podcast</a> to discuss his article <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3803377" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Solving the 'King Lear Problem'</a>, which recasts the story of King Lear as a case study on business succession, corporate governance, and fiduciary duty. This episode is hosted by <a href="https://andrewkjennings.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Andrew Jennings</a>, a teaching fellow and lecturer in law at Stanford Law School.

Ep.113 – Benjamin Means on Business Succession and King Lear

As many litigators will tell you, “business divorce on steroids” aptly describes the tenor of litigation that can erupt when members of a family-owned business have a falling out.  No one has devoted more scholarship to the topic of legal conflict in the family-owned business than Benjamin Means, a rising young Assistant Professor at the University Of South Carolina School Of Law. My New York Business Divorce blog previously featured an online interview of Ben on the subject.  In this episode, Ben discusses the factors that contribute to conflict in the family-owned business and some of his ideas on dispute avoidance and resolution.

Episode 7: Conflict In The Family - Owned Business - A Conversation With Professor Benjamin Means