Björn Brembs's guest appearances

Björn Brembs

Open Science Radio

Science for Progress

Carne Esperta

Jon Tennant

Diana Barbosa

Greg Wilson

Robert Miles

Maria Pinto

Mark Graham

Upulie Divisekera

Larry Young

David Geary

Colin Allen

Gary McDowell

Jennifer Polk

Dennis Eckmeier

David Spencer

Agustín Fuentes

OwlTail

The machine journalist "BIS" interviews the Professor of Neurobiology Björn Brembs to learn more about our human intelligence. http://brembs.net/  Subscribe so you don't miss new interviews: #carneesperta #smartmeat https://twitter.com/carneesperta https://www.instagram.com/carneesperta https://www.tiktok.com/@carneesperta fb.me/carneesperta m.me/carneesperta https://www.linkedin.com/company/carneesperta https://open.spotify.com/show/2H7YXepIPLgRGlam0SUkCY https://podcasts.apple.com/pt/podcast/carne-esperta/id1528942902https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8zMmM1YTk5MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==https://radiopublic.com/carne-esperta-GOKmQL/episodeshttps://pca.st/vq2t1l46https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCybiOAXQm2UYP9rKhIssFTA  To suggest a guest: https://bit.ly/carneespertaguests

<p>The machine journalist "BIS" interviews the Professor of Neurobiology Björn Brembs to learn more about our human intelligence. <a href="http://brembs.net/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://brembs.net/</a>  Subscribe so you don't miss new interviews: #carneesperta #smartmeat <a href="https://twitter.com/carneesperta" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/carneesperta</a> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/carneesperta" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.instagram.com/carneesperta</a> <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@carneesperta" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.tiktok.com/@carneesperta</a> <a href="http://fb.me/carneesperta" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">fb.me/carneesperta</a> <a href="http://m.me/carneesperta" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">m.me/carneesperta</a> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/carneesperta" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.linkedin.com/company/carneesperta</a> <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/2H7YXepIPLgRGlam0SUkCY" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://open.spotify.com/show/2H7YXepIPLgRGlam0SUkCY</a> <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/pt/podcast/carne-esperta/id1528942902" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://podcasts.apple.com/pt/podcast/carne-esperta/id1528942902</a><a href="https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8zMmM1YTk5MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8zMmM1YTk5MC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==</a><a href="https://radiopublic.com/carne-esperta-GOKmQL/episodes" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://radiopublic.com/carne-esperta-GOKmQL/episodes</a><a href="https://pca.st/vq2t1l46" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://pca.st/vq2t1l46</a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCybiOAXQm2UYP9rKhIssFTA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCybiOAXQm2UYP9rKhIssFTA</a>  To suggest a guest: <a href="https://bit.ly/carneespertaguests" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://bit.ly/carneespertaguests</a></p>

#40 'If you're too predictable, you may end up in the mouth of a predator' Prof. Björn Brembs | CE Podcast

What is the Journal Impact Factor?The Journal Impact Factor is widely used as a tool to evaluate studies, and researchers. It supposedly measures the quality of a journal by scoring how many citations an average article in this journal achieves. Committees making hiring and funding decisions use the 'JIF' as an approximation for the quality of the work a researcher has published, and in extension as an approximation for the capabilities of an applicant.Listen to the Full Conversation on Patreon!JIF as a measure of researcher meritI find this practice already highly questionable. First of all, it appears the formula calculates a statistical mean. However, no article can receive less than 0 citations, while there is no upper limit to citations. Most articles - across all journal - receive only very few citations, and only a few may receive a lot of citations. This means we have a 'skewed distribution' when we plot how many papers received how many citations. The statistical mean, however, is not applicable for skewed distributions. Moreover, basic statistics and probability tell us that if you blindly choose one paper from a journal, it is impossible to predict -or even roughly estimate - its quality by the average citation rate, alone. It is further impossible to know the author's actual contribution to said paper. Thus, we are already stacking three statistical fallacies by applying JIF to evaluate researchers.But this is just the beginning! Journals don't have an interest in the Journal Impact Factor as a tool for science evaluation. Their interest is in the advertising effect of the JIF. As we learn from our guest, Dr. Björn Brembs (professor for neurogenetics at University of Regensburg), journals negotiate with the private company Clarivate Analytics (in the past it was Reuters) that provides the numbers. Especially larger publishers have a lot of room to influence the numbers above and below the division line in their favor.Reputation is not quality.There is one thing the Journal Impact Factor can tell us: how good the reputation of the journal is among researchers. But does that really mean anything substantial? Björn Brembs reviewed a large body of studies that compared different measures of scientific rigor with the impact factor of journals. He finds that in most research fields the impact factor doesn't tell you anything about the quality of the work. In some fields it may even be a predictor of unreliable science! This reflects the tendency of high ranking journals to prefer novelty over quality.How does this affect science and academia?The JIF is omnipresent. A CV (the academic resume) is not only judged by the name of the journals in a publication list. Another factor is the funding a researcher has been able to get. However, funding committees may also use JIF to evaluate whether an applicant is worthy of funding. Another point on a CV is the reputation of the advisers, who were also evaluated by their publications and funding. Another important point on a CV is the reputation of the institute one worked at, which is to some degree evaluated by the publications and the funding of their principle investigators.It is easy to see how this puts a lot of power into the hands of the editors of high ranking journals. Björn Brembs is concerned about the probable effect this has on the quality of science overall. If the ability to woe editors and write persuasive stories leads to more success than rigorous science, researchers will behave accordingly. And they will also teach their students to put even more emphasis on their editor persuasion skills. Of course not all committees use JIF to determine who gets an interview. But still the best strategy for early career researchers is to put all their efforts into pushing their work into high ranking journals.What now?!We also talk about possible solutions to the problem.

What is the Journal Impact Factor?<br>The Journal Impact Factor is widely used as a tool to evaluate studies, and researchers. It supposedly measures the quality of a journal by scoring how many citations an average article in this journal achieves. Committees making hiring and funding decisions use the 'JIF' as an approximation for the quality of the work a researcher has published, and in extension as an approximation for the capabilities of an applicant.<br>Listen to the Full Conversation on Patreon!<br>JIF as a measure of researcher merit<br>I find this practice already highly questionable. First of all, it appears the formula calculates a statistical mean. However, no article can receive less than 0 citations, while there is no upper limit to citations. Most articles - across all journal - receive only very few citations, and only a few may receive a lot of citations. This means we have a 'skewed distribution' when we plot how many papers received how many citations. The statistical mean, however, is not applicable for skewed distributions. Moreover, basic statistics and probability tell us that if you blindly choose one paper from a journal, it is impossible to predict -or even roughly estimate - its quality by the average citation rate, alone. It is further impossible to know the author's actual contribution to said paper. Thus, we are already stacking three statistical fallacies by applying JIF to evaluate researchers.<br>But this is just the beginning! Journals don't have an interest in the Journal Impact Factor as a tool for science evaluation. Their interest is in the advertising effect of the JIF. As we learn from our guest, Dr. Björn Brembs (professor for neurogenetics at University of Regensburg), journals negotiate with the private company Clarivate Analytics (in the past it was Reuters) that provides the numbers. Especially larger publishers have a lot of room to influence the numbers above and below the division line in their favor.<br>Reputation is not quality.<br>There is one thing the Journal Impact Factor can tell us: how good the reputation of the journal is among researchers. But does that really mean anything substantial? Björn Brembs reviewed a large body of studies that compared different measures of scientific rigor with the impact factor of journals. He finds that in most research fields the impact factor doesn't tell you anything about the quality of the work. In some fields it may even be a predictor of unreliable science! This reflects the tendency of high ranking journals to prefer novelty over quality.<br>How does this affect science and academia?<br>The JIF is omnipresent. A CV (the academic resume) is not only judged by the name of the journals in a publication list. Another factor is the funding a researcher has been able to get. However, funding committees may also use JIF to evaluate whether an applicant is worthy of funding. Another point on a CV is the reputation of the advisers, who were also evaluated by their publications and funding. Another important point on a CV is the reputation of the institute one worked at, which is to some degree evaluated by the publications and the funding of their principle investigators.<br>It is easy to see how this puts a lot of power into the hands of the editors of high ranking journals. Björn Brembs is concerned about the probable effect this has on the quality of science overall. If the ability to woe editors and write persuasive stories leads to more success than rigorous science, researchers will behave accordingly. And they will also teach their students to put even more emphasis on their editor persuasion skills. Of course not all committees use JIF to determine who gets an interview. But still the best strategy for early career researchers is to put all their efforts into pushing their work into high ranking journals.<br>What now?!<br>We also talk about possible solutions to the problem.

9: The Journal Impact Factor: how (not) to evaluate researchers  – with Björn Brembs

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Academic publishing that is. And actually not only in Denmark. Even though open access publishing has picked up quite a bit over the last years, academic publishing today is still rather dominated by legacy publishers who mainly play their old game without much signs of changing and adapting to current technological and scientific developments. In fact, many of them are not even showing much willingness to consider changing. A lot of the recent studies and arguments point out that a complete transition to open access publishing potentially yields many positive social effects for the academic system and society as a whole, and even might achieved quite substantial savings. We had the great opportunity to talk Björn Brembs about these points, the obstacles, the necessary steps and a vision of how a publishing infrastructure could look like. We apologize for the less optimal audio quality and hope you’re still enjoying the conversation. Have fun!  This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License     Teilnehmer    Matthias Fromm   Twitter   GitHub   Website   ORCiD   Linkedin   Website   Thomann Wishlist   Amazon Wishlist     Konrad Förstner   Twitter   Website   GitHub   ORCiD   ResearchGate     Björn Brembs   Website   Twitter   Website   ORCiD   ResearchGate   GitHub       Shownotes: OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN]   Welcome 00:00:00  Introduction Björn Brembs 00:00:46 Drosophila; — Professor of Neurogenetics at the Institute of Zoology at the Universität Regensburg;. The flaws of the system 00:03:27 Björn’s blog post about whether a cost-neutral transition to Open Access would be realistic; — On average a scientific article costs 5,000 USD (based on estimations); — SciELO; — NIH; — Scholastica; — ScienceOpen; — F1000 Research; — Gold Open Access; — Nature; — Nature is on the record to need to charge 50,000 USD per article to maintain current revenue levels; — Springer Nature; — Collective Action Problem;. Where to start a change? 00:35:29 Acquisition of Mendeley by Elsevier; — Elsevier profit exceeds 1 Billion Euro in 2017; — UN lists more than 7 Million full-time equivalents researchers; — Elsevier Vice Presidents for Government Relations; — Carolyn Malone and Darrell Issa drafting a bill making Green Open Access illegal in the US; — Darrell Issa; — Carolyn Maloney; — Research Works Act; (Angelika Lex, VP Academic and Government Relations DACH - ‎Elsevier;)  — Germany’s Corruption Index; — Bibliometrics;. Quality 00:55:43 Björn’s review article in Frontiers: „Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability“; — Reproducibility crisis; — Science article about fickle mice revealing already „reproduction“ problems;. Infrastructure 01:11:04 collaborative authoring environment; — eduroam; — Elsevier acquisition of bepress; — List of Elsevier’s acquisitions; — Vendor lock-in; — Research software engineers; — Open standards; — DEAL consortia in Germany;. Epilog 01:32:16  (TIB – Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology and University Library;)  — Sören Auer, Director of TIB; — Open Science Lab @ TIB;.  Verknüpfte Episoden:  OSR074 Overlay Journals #oscibar [EN]OSR079 Opening reproducible research (Poster Session) #osc2017 [EN]OSR080 DeepGreen – Open Access Transformation for German Science (Poster Session) #osc2017 [EN]OSR097 Unsere ersten News 2018 [DE]OSR101 Open Science 101 [EN]OSR125 Die kleine Antwort zur kleinen Anfrage, und mehr aus der Infrastrukturhölle [DE]OSR170 Don’t Leave It To Google! – Research Infrastructures [EN]OSR174 Gründe für Puls [DE]OSR176 Podiumsdiskussion „Wie wird das wissenschaftliche Publizieren der Zukunft aussehen?“ [DE]OSR197 Personalisiertes Tracking von WissenschaftlerInnen durch Verlage

<p>Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Academic publishing that is. And actually not only in Denmark. Even though open access publishing has picked up quite a bit over the last years, academic publishing today is still rather dominated by legacy publishers who mainly play their old game without much signs of changing and adapting to current technological and scientific developments. In fact, many of them are not even showing much willingness to consider changing. A lot of the recent studies and arguments point out that a complete transition to open access publishing potentially yields many positive social effects for the academic system and society as a whole, and even might achieved quite substantial savings. We had the great opportunity to talk Björn Brembs about these points, the obstacles, the necessary steps and a vision of how a publishing infrastructure could look like.</p> <p>We apologize for the less optimal audio quality and hope you’re still enjoying the conversation. Have fun!</p> <p> </p><p>This work is licensed under a <br/> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a><br/> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> </a><br/> </p> <strong> Teilnehmer </strong> <ul> <li> <strong>Matthias Fromm</strong> <ul> <li> <a href="https://twitter.com/matthiasfromm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Twitter</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://github.com/matthiasfromm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">GitHub</a> </li> <li> <a href="http://www.mfromm.de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Website</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-0768" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ORCiD</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://de.linkedin.com/in/matthiasfromm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Linkedin</a> </li> <li> <a href="http://about.me/matthiasfromm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Website</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.thomann.de/de/wishlist_4u_0f8db750ef9c.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Thomann Wishlist</a> </li> <li> <a href="http://www.amazon.de/registry/wishlist/ZXZEE7VFSIZ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Amazon Wishlist</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <strong>Konrad Förstner</strong> <ul> <li> <a href="https://twitter.com/konradfoerstner" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Twitter</a> </li> <li> <a href="http://konrad.foerstner.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Website</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://github.com/konrad" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">GitHub</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1481-2996" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ORCiD</a> </li> <li> <a href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Konrad_Foerstner" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ResearchGate</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <strong>Björn Brembs</strong> <ul> <li> <a href="http://bjoern.brembs.net/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Website</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://twitter.com/brembs" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Twitter</a> </li> <li> <a href="http://lab.brembs.net/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Website</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-7650" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ORCiD</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bjoern_Brembs" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ResearchGate</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://github.com/brembs" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">GitHub</a> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> <strong> Shownotes: <a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2018/03/01/osr098-academic-publishing-infrastructures-with-bjoern-brembs-en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN]</a> </strong> </p> <h2>Welcome</h2> 00:00:00<p> </p> <h2>Introduction Björn Brembs</h2> 00:00:46<p> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drosophila" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Drosophila;</a> — Professor of Neurogenetics at the Institute of Zoology at the Universität Regensburg;.</p> <h2>The flaws of the system</h2> 00:03:27<p> <a href="http://bjoern.brembs.net/2017/11/is-a-cost-neutral-transition-to-open-access-realistic/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Björn’s blog post about whether a cost-neutral transition to Open Access would be realistic;</a> — <a href="https://www.nature.com/news/open-access-the-true-cost-of-science-publishing-1.12676" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">On average a scientific article costs 5,000 USD (based on estimations);</a> — <a href="http://www.scielo.org/php/index.php?lang=en" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">SciELO;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institutes_of_Health" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">NIH;</a> — <a href="https://scholasticahq.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Scholastica;</a> — <a href="https://www.scienceopen.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ScienceOpen;</a> — <a href="https://f1000research.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">F1000 Research;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access#Journals:_gold_open_access" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Gold Open Access;</a> — <a href="https://www.nature.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Nature;</a> — <a href="https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399we163.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Nature is on the record to need to charge 50,000 USD per article to maintain current revenue levels;</a> — <a href="https://www.springernature.com/de/group/aboutus" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Springer Nature;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_action#Collective_action_problem" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Collective Action Problem;</a>.</p> <h2>Where to start a change?</h2> 00:35:29<p> <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2013/04/08/confirmed-elsevier-has-bought-mendeley-for-69m-100m-to-expand-open-social-education-data-efforts/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Acquisition of Mendeley by Elsevier;</a> — <a href="https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/elseviers-profits-swell-more-ps900-million" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Elsevier profit exceeds 1 Billion Euro in 2017;</a> — <a href="https://en.unesco.org/node/252277" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">UN lists more than 7 Million full-time equivalents researchers;</a> — Elsevier Vice Presidents for Government Relations; — <a href="http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=807" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Carolyn Malone and Darrell Issa drafting a bill making Green Open Access illegal in the US;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darrell_Issa" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Darrell Issa;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolyn_Maloney" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Carolyn Maloney;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_Works_Act" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Research Works Act;</a> (<a href="https://twitter.com/angelikalex" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Angelika Lex, VP Academic and Government Relations DACH - ‎Elsevier;</a>)  — <a href="https://www.transparency.org/country/DEU" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Germany’s Corruption Index;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliometrics" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Bibliometrics;</a>.</p> <h2>Quality</h2> 00:55:43<p> <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037/full" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Björn’s review article in Frontiers: „Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability“;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Reproducibility crisis;</a> — <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/284/5420/1599.1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Science article about fickle mice revealing already „reproduction“ problems;</a>.</p> <h2>Infrastructure</h2> 01:11:04<p> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_writing" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">collaborative authoring environment;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduroam" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">eduroam;</a> — <a href="https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/corporate/elsevier-acquires-bepress,-a-leading-service-provider-used-by-academic-institutions-to-showcase-their-research" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Elsevier acquisition of bepress;</a> — <a href="https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/elsevier/acquisitions/acquisitions_list" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">List of Elsevier’s acquisitions;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vendor_lock-in" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Vendor lock-in;</a> — <a href="http://rse.ac.uk/about/why-research-needs-rses/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Research software engineers;</a> — <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_standard" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Open standards;</a> — <a href="https://www.projekt-deal.de/about-deal/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">DEAL consortia in Germany;</a>.</p> <h2>Epilog</h2> 01:32:16<p>  (<a href="https://www.tib.eu/en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">TIB – Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology and University Library;</a>)  — <a href="https://www.tib.eu/en/service/news/details/soeren-auer-is-new-director-of-technische-informationsbibliothek-tib/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Sören Auer, Director of TIB;</a> — <a href="https://www.tib.eu/en/research-development/open-science/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Open Science Lab @ TIB;</a>.</p> <p></p> <p>Verknüpfte Episoden:</p> <p> </p><ul><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2017/03/21/osr074-overlay-journals-oscibar-en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR074 Overlay Journals #oscibar [EN]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2017/03/22/osr079-opening-reproducible-research-poster-session-osc2017-en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR079 Opening reproducible research (Poster Session) #osc2017 [EN]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2017/03/22/osr080-deepgreen-open-access-transformation-for-german-science-poster-session-osc2017-en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR080 DeepGreen – Open Access Transformation for German Science (Poster Session) #osc2017 [EN]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2018/02/20/osr097-unsere-ersten-news-2018-de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR097 Unsere ersten News 2018 [DE]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2018/03/09/osr101-open-science-101-en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR101 Open Science 101 [EN]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2018/06/07/osr125-die-kleine-antwort-zur-kleinen-anfrage-und-mehr-aus-der-infrastrukturhoelle-de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR125 Die kleine Antwort zur kleinen Anfrage, und mehr aus der Infrastrukturhölle [DE]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2019/06/07/osr170-dont-leave-it-to-google-research-infrastructures-en/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR170 Don’t Leave It To Google! – Research Infrastructures [EN]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2019/10/01/osr174-gruende-fuer-puls-de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR174 Gründe für Puls [DE]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2019/11/13/osr176-podiumsdiskussion-wie-wird-das-wissenschaftliche-publizieren-der-zukunft-aussehen-de/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR176 Podiumsdiskussion „Wie wird das wissenschaftliche Publizieren der Zukunft aussehen?“ [DE]</a></li><li><a href="https://www.openscienceradio.org/2020/12/29/osr197-personalisiertes-tracking-von-wissenschaftlerinnen-durch-verlage/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">OSR197 Personalisiertes Tracking von WissenschaftlerInnen durch Verlage</a></li></ul>

OSR098 Academic Publishing Infrastructures with Björn Brembs [EN]