Nina Varsava's guest appearances

Nina Varsava

Ipse Dixit

Law in Action: A UW Law School Podcast

Dissenting Opinions

Stephen Sachs

Tim Schneider

Eric Goldman

Carrie Goldberg

Lawrence Lessig

Nicholas Bagley

Heidi Matthews

Leigh Goodmark

Todd Zywicki

Simon Tam

Greg Shill

Adam Winkler

Patrick O'Donnell

David Ley

Ben Carter

OwlTail

An interview with Assistant Professor of Law Nina Varsava at the University of Wisconsin Law School. Prof. Varsava discusses her forthcoming article, "Precedent, Reliance, and Dobbs". The article examines treatment of stare decisis in the 2022 majority Dobbs opinion focusing on its approach to reliance. The article argues that the justices’ refusal to recognize the reliance interest at stake is inconsistent with the Court’s previously prevailing stare decisis doctrine and is also mistaken as a matter of first principles, undermining basic rule of law values.

An interview with Assistant Professor of Law Nina Varsava at the University of Wisconsin Law School. Prof. Varsava discusses her forthcoming article, "Precedent, Reliance, and Dobbs". The article examines treatment of stare decisis in the 2022 majority Dobbs opinion focusing on its approach to reliance. The article argues that the justices’ refusal to recognize the reliance interest at stake is inconsistent with the Court’s previously prevailing stare decisis doctrine and is also mistaken as a matter of first principles, undermining basic rule of law values.

Nina Varsava Podcast Interview- Episode 29

Will is joined by University of Wisconsin law professor Nina Varsava, where they discuss how to make sense of fractured Supreme Court opinions in light of Marks v. United States. They also discuss the applications of Marks's "narrowest grounds" test in the recent jury-trial decision of Ramos v. Louisiana, with plenty of Dworkin along the way. Later in the episode they dig into Nina's infamous paper on judicial rhetoric.Case audio from Oyez.org

Will is joined by University of Wisconsin law professor Nina Varsava, where they discuss how to make sense of fractured Supreme Court opinions in light of Marks v. United States. They also discuss the applications of Marks's "narrowest grounds" test in the recent jury-trial decision of Ramos v. Louisiana, with plenty of Dworkin along the way. Later in the episode they dig into Nina's infamous paper on judicial rhetoric.Case audio from <a href="http://Oyez.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Oyez.org</a>

Fractured Opinions (with Nina Varsava)

In this episode, Nina Varsava, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Madison Law School, discusses her essay "Precedent on Precedent," which will be published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online. Varsava begins by explaining what happened in the recent Supreme Court case Ramos v. Louisiana (2020), and how it reflects the differing views of the Supreme Court justices on the nature of constitutional precedent. She explains the different positions, and reflects on how they might play out in the future. Varsava is on Twitter at @NinaVarsava.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="https://law.wisc.edu/profiles/nvarsava@wisc.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Nina Varsava</a>, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Madison Law School, discusses her essay "<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3591153" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Precedent on Precedent</a>," which will be published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online. Varsava begins by explaining what happened in the recent Supreme Court case <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-5924_n6io.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Ramos v. Louisiana</a> (2020), and how it reflects the differing views of the Supreme Court justices on the nature of constitutional precedent. She explains the different positions, and reflects on how they might play out in the future. Varsava is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/NinaVarsava" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">@NinaVarsava</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/brianlfrye" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">@brianlfrye</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Nina Varsava on Precedent