Matt Teichman's guest appearances

Matt Teichman

Elucidations

Ipse Dixit

Agnes Callard

Brian Leiter

Brian L. Frye

Peter Adamson

Carrie Goldberg

Lawrence Lessig

Nicholas Bagley

Heidi Matthews

Leigh Goodmark

Todd Zywicki

Simon Tam

Greg Shill

Adam Winkler

Bryan Caplan

Patrick O'Donnell

OwlTail

In this episode, Matt Teichman, a full-time lecturer in the humanities at the University of Chicago and the host of the Elucidations philosophy podcast, discusses his work on generic statements and their implications for implied ethics. Teichman begins by identifying generic statements and explaining why they present a philosophical problem. He observes that generic statements are especially contentious in relation to groups of people, because they can be offensive. But he argues that some offensive statements can be desirable, especially when they are made in the service of social justice.  And he suggests that understanding the function of generic statement can help us whether they are desirable or undesirable. Teichman is on Twitter at @ElucidationsPod.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, <a href="http://home.uchicago.edu/~teichman/about.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Matt Teichman</a>, a full-time lecturer in the humanities at the University of Chicago and the host of the <a href="https://shows.pippa.io/elucidations" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Elucidations</a> philosophy podcast, discusses his work on generic statements and their implications for implied ethics. Teichman begins by identifying generic statements and explaining why they present a philosophical problem. He observes that generic statements are especially contentious in relation to groups of people, because they can be offensive. But he argues that some offensive statements can be desirable, especially when they are made in the service of social justice. And he suggests that understanding the function of generic statement can help us whether they are desirable or undesirable. Teichman is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/elucidationspod?lang=en" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@ElucidationsPod</a>.This episode was hosted by <a href="http://law.uky.edu/directory/brian-l-frye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Brian L. Frye</a>, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at <a href="https://twitter.com/brianlfrye" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">@brianlfrye</a>. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Matt Teichman on Offensive Generic Statements

Toby Buckle

Bonus episode! In this joint edition of Elucidations and the Political Philosophy Podcast, Matt Teichman and Toby Buckle sit down and have a freeform conversation about why we do podcasts, the nature of moral disagreement, and the existence of political divides. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Bonus episode! In this joint edition of Elucidations and the Political Philosophy Podcast, Matt Teichman and Toby Buckle sit down and have a freeform conversation about why we do podcasts, the nature of moral disagreement, and the existence of political divides. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Episode 109: Bonus Episode with Matt Teichman and Toby Buckle