James Snapp Jr's guest appearances

James Snapp Jr

Real Science Radio

Bob Enyart Live

Classical Theism Podcast

Ryan Mullins

Thomas Aquinas

Temple Grandin

Kevin Anderson

Sean Carroll

Lawrence Krauss

James Brent

Tim Mahoney

Jimmy Akin

David Bates

Brandon Vogt

Matt Fradd

Fred Williams

Ryan Hurd

Joe Heschmeyer

OwlTail

Bob Enyart interviews the author of Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20. In all of church history, the very first surviving quote from Mark's last chapter, written in the 100s by an influential bishop in France, quotes verse 19. Thus begins the long and powerful defense for the full chapter being written by Mark. Of the 1,650 Greek manuscripts that include Mark, only three end at verse 8. These, along with 40 church fathers who wrote while Rome still had an emperor on the throne, along with thousands of additional manuscripts in other languages, correct the false claim of the "higher critics" of the 1800s and even many of today's populist theologians such as James White, John MacArthur, and Matt Slick, that the ending of Mark's Gospel should be rejected. If these critics were right, Mark would have penned the worst ending in the history of endings, without record of Jesus appearing to the apostles, nor to the women who went to His tomb. Instead, it would end like this, "So [the women] went out quickly and fled from the tomb, for they trembled and were amazed. And they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid." Instead of that absurdity, here is the testimony of Bishop Irenaeus circa 180 A.D. who wrote of the beginning and ending of the Gospel, "Wherefore also Mark, the interpreter and follower of Peter, does thus commence his Gospel narrative: 'The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; as it is written in the prophets' [then] towards the conclusion of his Gospel, Mark says,  'So then, after the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, He was received up into heaven, and sits on the right hand of God.'" By James Snapp: - thetextofthegospels.com - Mark 16 in two videos, Part 2 (#17) and Part 1 (#16) embedded right here...  RSR Defending the Text: - Rescuing Mark's last 12 verses (this program) - Resolving those Alleged Contradictions - Demolishing the JEDP Documentary Hypothesis - Liberals and Atheists No Longer Control Our Greek Text  You're Invited! On Tuesday Bob Enyart will present online The Hydroplate Theory and Its Astounding Confirmed Predictions to the Twin Cities Creation Science Association. If you would like to view this live at 7:30 p.m. CENTRAL Time, please email the TCCSA's David Johnson to get the link! 

Bob Enyart interviews the author of <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Authentic-Case-Mark-9-20-2016-ebook/dp/B01EU1OR9O" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20</a>. In all of church history, the very first surviving quote from Mark's last chapter, written in the 100s by an influential bishop in France, quotes verse 19. Thus begins the long and powerful defense for the full chapter being written by Mark. Of the 1,650 Greek manuscripts that include Mark, only three end at verse 8. These, along with 40 church fathers who wrote while Rome still had an emperor on the throne, along with thousands of additional manuscripts in other languages, correct the false claim of the "higher critics" of the 1800s and even many of today's populist theologians such as James White, John MacArthur, and Matt Slick, that the ending of Mark's Gospel should be rejected. If these critics were right, Mark would have penned the worst ending in the history of endings, without record of Jesus appearing to the apostles, nor to the women who went to His tomb. Instead, it would end like this, "So [the women] went out quickly and fled from the tomb, for they trembled and were amazed. And they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid." Instead of that absurdity, here is the testimony of Bishop Irenaeus circa 180 A.D. who wrote of the beginning and ending of the Gospel, "Wherefore also Mark, the interpreter and follower of Peter, does thus commence his Gospel narrative: 'The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; as it is written in the prophets' [then] towards the conclusion of his Gospel, Mark says,  'So then, after the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, He was received up into heaven, and sits on the right hand of God.'" By James Snapp: - <a href="https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">thetextofthegospels.com</a> - Mark 16 in two videos, Part 2 (#17) and Part 1 (#16) embedded right here... RSR Defending the Text: - <a href="https://rsr.org//mark-ending-with-james-snapp" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Rescuing Mark's last 12 verses</a> (this program) - <a href="https://kgov.com/the-plot" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Resolving those Alleged Contradictions</a> - <a href="https://rsr.org/documentary-hypothesis" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Demolishing the JEDP Documentary Hypothesis</a> - <a href="https://rsr.org/greek-new-testament-alan-bunning-cntr" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Liberals and Atheists No Longer Control Our Greek Text</a> <blockquote> You're Invited! On Tuesday Bob Enyart will present online <a href="https://tccsa.tc/calendar.html#enyart_2021" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Hydroplate Theory and Its Astounding Confirmed Predictions</a> to the Twin Cities Creation Science Association. If you would like to view this live at 7:30 p.m. CENTRAL Time, <a href="mailto:david-johnson@usfamily.net?subject=Hi%20David!%20I%27m%20a%20Real%20Science%20Radio%20listener.%20Can%20I%20get%20the%20link%20to...&amp;body=Hi%20David!%20I%27m%20a%20Real%20Science%20Radio%20listener.%20Can%20I%20get%20the%20link%20to%20Bob%20Enyart%27s%20HPT%20Predictions%20Zoom%20presentation%3F">please email</a> the TCCSA's David Johnson to get the link! </blockquote>

Rescuing Mark's last 12 verses with James Snapp Jr

What is the Longer Ending of Mark? What are the arguments against its authenticity? Can they be answered? What are the arguments for its authenticity? James Snapp Jr. joins us to discuss the evidence surrounding this contested passage. The Classical Theism Podcast aims to defend Catholic Christian ideas in conversation. With the help of various guests, I defend three pillars of the Catholic Christian worldview: (1) the God of classical theism exists, (2) Jesus is our Messiah and Lord, and (3) He founded the Catholic Church. We place a strong emphasis on the first pillar, defending classical theism, drawing upon the work of Thomistic philosopher Dr. Edward Feser and many others. John DeRosa www.classicaltheism.com/support

What is the Longer Ending of Mark? What are the arguments against its authenticity? Can they be answered? What are the arguments for its authenticity? James Snapp Jr. joins us to discuss the evidence surrounding this contested passage. The Classical Theism Podcast aims to defend Catholic Christian ideas in conversation. With the help of various guests, I defend three pillars of the Catholic Christian worldview: (1) the God of classical theism exists, (2) Jesus is our Messiah and Lord, and (3) He founded the Catholic Church. We place a strong emphasis on the first pillar, defending classical theism, drawing upon the work of Thomistic philosopher Dr. Edward Feser and many others. John DeRosa <a href="http://www.classicaltheism.com/contact" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.classicaltheism.com/support</a>

BONUS|Defending the Longer Ending of Mark w/ James Snapp Jr.

What is textual criticism? Should Christians be concerned that there are hundreds of thousands of variants within the New Testament manuscript copies we possess? Are John 7:53 - 8:11 and Mark 16:9-20 inspired Scripture? What should we make of the claims that John 7:53-8:11 isn't found in any of the earliest or best manuscripts? Or the idea that it "floats around" and is found in other places of John or Luke? James Snapp Jr. joins us for an exciting bonus episode to answer these questions and more. The Classical Theism Podcast aims to defend Catholic Christian ideas in conversation. With the help of various guests, I defend three pillars of the Catholic Christian worldview: (1) the God of classical theism exists, (2) Jesus is our Messiah and Lord, and (3) He founded the Catholic Church. We place a strong emphasis on the first pillar, defending classical theism, drawing upon the work of Thomistic philosopher Dr. Edward Feser and many others. John DeRosa www.classicaltheism.com/support

What is textual criticism? Should Christians be concerned that there are hundreds of thousands of variants within the New Testament manuscript copies we possess? Are John 7:53 - 8:11 and Mark 16:9-20 inspired Scripture? What should we make of the claims that John 7:53-8:11 isn't found in any of the earliest or best manuscripts? Or the idea that it "floats around" and is found in other places of John or Luke? James Snapp Jr. joins us for an exciting bonus episode to answer these questions and more. The Classical Theism Podcast aims to defend Catholic Christian ideas in conversation. With the help of various guests, I defend three pillars of the Catholic Christian worldview: (1) the God of classical theism exists, (2) Jesus is our Messiah and Lord, and (3) He founded the Catholic Church. We place a strong emphasis on the first pillar, defending classical theism, drawing upon the work of Thomistic philosopher Dr. Edward Feser and many others. John DeRosa <a href="http://www.classicaltheism.com/contact" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.classicaltheism.com/support</a>

BONUS|Is John 7:53 - 8:11 part of Scripture? w/ James Snapp Jr. (textual criticism pt. 1)